The Nuclear Blast Durability Challenge

Started by ExtraMision55559 pages
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I just wanted to post something and didn't have anything constructive to say 😮

😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by Dinalfos
He's neither the strongest nor the most durable. His physique is basically an amped version of Prof. Hulk, who wasn't very durable compared to the older Hulks. Besides that, Hulk and gamma radiation have a bit of a love-hate relationship.

But, it's still weird, isn't it?
It amped Banner, and killed Maestro.

By the way, I would love to find out what the writers think of Maestro and his ranking in strength.
Logic dictates that it would be the Maestro.

Originally posted by bigbran
So your saying he could survive planet busters?
Originally posted by masterbruce
In theory, yes.

Also, if you are so concerned about this, do you ever question the validity of planet busting power? I think it's such garbage that characters like Gladiator, Beta Ray Bill, Sufer can bust planets. In order to bust a planet the size of earth for example, you would need over 1 Million nukes just to take out the surface. That implies that those guys have the power of AT LEAST one million nukes at their hand. Which means, even if they usually fight at 1/1,000,000th (in other words, a flick of their pinky) their full power, they would wield the power of one nuclear bomb, which is complete utter crap. Comic book writers should either elevate them to Galactus or God status if they want to keep the planet busting feats or just erase those ridiculous feats if they want those characters to be believable at all.

Did anyone else see this except me?
He said that Wolverine could survive a planet destroying attack!