classic Captain America versus classic Sabretooth

Started by masterbruce1 pages
masterbruce Senior Member

classic Captain America versus classic Sabretooth

bloodlust on

The_Barbarian Restricted

Re: classic Captain America versus classic Sabretooth

Originally posted by masterbruce
bloodlust on

Sabretooth at his current level will defeat the Captain quite quickly.

Soljer Beware my Power
Originally posted by The_Barbarian
Sabretooth at his current level will defeat the Captain quite quickly.

Good thing it says 'classic' then...

But, on that note, HOW classic? For example, ORIGINALLY, Sabretooth didn't even have a healing factor.

Are we talking THAT classic?

SpunkySmurph tu quoqumber

Originally posted by Soljer
Good thing it says 'classic' then...

But, on that note, HOW classic? For example, ORIGINALLY, Sabretooth didn't even have a healing factor.

Are we talking THAT classic?

Wasn't original Sabes just a guy with spikes on his gloves...?

Alfheim Junior Member
Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
Wasn't original Sabes just a guy with spikes on his gloves...?

Not that classic, surely he means marauder Sabretooth. If so Cap wins 10/10

Alfheim Junior Member
Originally posted by Alfheim
Not that classic, surely he means marauder Sabretooth. If so Cap wins 10/10

Well morlock mutant massacre sabretooth....marauder sabretooth is vague.

PRAYERRUN Senior Member

If cap can beat wolverine, he can beat sabertooth.

The_Barbarian Restricted

Originally posted by Soljer
Good thing it says 'classic' then...

But, on that note, HOW classic? For example, ORIGINALLY, Sabretooth didn't even have a healing factor.

Are we talking THAT classic?

A valid argument consists of a state of true premises, i.e. 'classic' Captain America. Stating that it is a 'good thing' to use a presupposed premise, i.e. 'classic', does not make one's conclusion about anothers argument valid. Nice try.

hulk10 Senior Member

Classic my butt, cap would woop sabertooths butt hands down.

Soljer Beware my Power
Originally posted by The_Barbarian
A valid argument consists of a state of true premises, i.e. 'classic' Captain America. Stating that it is a 'good thing' to use a presupposed premise, i.e. 'classic', does not make one's conclusion about anothers argument valid. Nice try.

I made no conclusions about any one else's argument. You inferred them, so get off your high horse.

Secondly, since you apparently just got out of your Jr. High Psych class, tell me; which logical fallacy is it when one debater argues something that is COMPLETELY unrelated to the argument at hand?

Cause, current Sabretooth is nowhere to be seen in this thread.