Villian Designs Revealed!!! VENOM

not of the above, harry is meantioned as a new villain, not a comic one, raimi said, but i bet he wont have a nick name,i'll wait for the credits too see if there is a label.

in my opinion sony/ps3/spiderman wanted to win over microsoft/xbox/harry-whateversupervilainiam.

I think David Koepp mentioned that Harry is the new goblin so it's a high possibility that JJ will name him on the Daily Bugle newspapers 🙁

found this

i doubt he will have the spider on the chest, if he does, it wont be like that,maybe a variation of the spider man got with the suit and a little dimmed. but thanks for sharing this with us, whre did you find it?
you know you could be fanmade.

Its the movie production art...

thats a real thing man, but i cant wait i think he looks fine

i can tell you that means nothing, first thing the tongue has been removed becouse someone though it could have a sexual conotation and this is a kid movie (yah you heard that right), i refer to kid instead of family,this was a producer opinion.

plus i doubt you will see that spide on the chest, no way.

-the link to the site i got it from is on the picture
-my opinion: better than the purple venom pic

-the purple version of Venom found at the start of this thread and the Darker Venom i posted BOTH have the white symbiote Spider on the chest...both versions. Both versions are basically the same except this one looks better and darker. other than that they both have the tongues, the teeth, the spider symbole, the webbing, the 'suit texture'...

they would have the tongue despite the 'sexuality' of it. kids can make anything a sexual joke these days. i seriously doubt spiderman 3 can be considered a family film...

the tone is much darker, and kids got scared at spiderman 1 just think how much more itll be now. i dont think the producer is in charge of character design.

Originally posted by Silverstein
-the link to the site i got it from is on the picture
-my opinion: better than the purple venom pic

-the purple version of Venom found at the start of this thread and the Darker Venom i posted BOTH have the white symbiote Spider on the chest...both versions. Both versions are basically the same except this one looks better and darker. other than that they both have the tongues, the teeth, the spider symbole, the webbing, the 'suit texture'...

they would have the tongue despite the 'sexuality' of it. kids can make anything a sexual joke these days. i seriously doubt spiderman 3 can be considered a family film...

the tone is much darker, and kids got scared at spiderman 1 just think how much more itll be now. i dont think the producer is in charge of character design.

Losing the tongue would be really stupid, but with out the white Spider on his chest will make a lame wannabe Venom.

yeah, otherwise he'll look like symbiote spiderman, except a bit more pumped up and a mouth...

they cant get rid of the tongue because it might hint to something sexual. pff, kids can make anything a sexual joke these days. Green Goblin's eyes look suspicsiously like a scrotom or doc ock can give reach arounds with his tentacles, kids will say stuff anyways, ooo his tongue can lick ppl down there like the dude from kiss who cares, no reason to take it out of the movie...