I'm amazed to no small end that anyone could call the action of the first Spider-Man versus Juggernaut a "low" showing for either character.
Pete defeats arguably the greatest legitimate opponent a metahuman of his type COULD plausibly expect to defeat without that opponent limiting their full max damage output against him (e.g. Firelord, 1985) there.
So, you must have some durability showings in mind that negate Pete's vulnerability to structural collapse on that scale? I'd be interested in seeing them.
With the notable exception of a web shield, I don't see where there's any other response save the following to that particular problem ...
Originally posted by bluewaterriderVulnerability to structural collapse? Since when is that a thing? He's got out/avoded sctructural collapse many times. Not sure how it's even a concern in a featureless environment, but assuming it somehow is.. just because there are instances of stuff falling on top him doesn't make it some sort of superhero weakness. That's like saying that if you got hit by a ball once that means every times someone throws a ball it will end up hitting you in the head. Here's an example of Pete escaping from a collapsing building, not just some debries but the entire building coming down on him:
I'm amazed to no small end that anyone could call the action of the first Spider-Man versus Juggernaut a "low" showing for either character.
Pete defeats arguably the greatest legitimate opponent a metahuman of his type COULD plausibly expect to defeat without that opponent limiting their full max damage output against him (e.g. Firelord, 1985) there.So, you must have some durability showings in mind that negate Pete's vulnerability to structural collapse on that scale? I'd be interested in seeing them.
With the notable exception of a web shield, I don't see where there's any other response save the following to that particular problem ...
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
I'm amazed to no small end that anyone could call the action of the first Spider-Man versus Juggernaut a "low" showing for either character.
Pete defeats arguably the greatest legitimate opponent a metahuman of his type COULD plausibly expect to defeat without that opponent limiting their full max damage output against him (e.g. Firelord, 1985) there.So, you must have some durability showings in mind that negate Pete's vulnerability to structural collapse on that scale? I'd be interested in seeing them.
With the notable exception of a web shield, I don't see where there's any other response save the following to that particular problem ...
It has nothing to do with juggernaut or durability its about spider sense combined with insane speed. Also, this fight won't be taking place in a building.
Originally posted by SamZED
Vulnerability to structural collapse? Since when is that a thing? He's got out/avoided structural collapse many times. Not sure how it's even a concern in a featureless environment, but assuming it somehow is ...http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17261156/ASM_651_021.jpg.html
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/17261157/ASM_651_022.jpg.html
(Not only did he escape he also managed to get Black Cat out.)
I'm glad you posted. You enabled me to figure out the mystery of why Carver's images were coming out postage-stamp size. You guys are using phones as opposed to laptops, and, for whatever reason, even removing the beginning code, "s4d3" or whatever, isn't enough to correct it for ordinary computers.
But the format above works, the "jpg dot html" bit, at least once parsed once more with URLs.
--------------------
It's a "concern in a featureless environment" because I was assuming this fight was taking place IN an environment WITH some normal features.
Mainly New York City, the setting for most other X-Men versus Spider-Man encounters, save Secret Wars I.
In other words, a place where Spider-Man has the theoretical resources of cover and web-swinging maneuverability afforded by tall buildings.
I REALLY don't see where you guys think he has much chance if he's fighting Rogue in an open field. Not even 3/10. Especially not when a tactic as simple as the following can keep him at bay:
The more open the field, the larger the advantage for spider-man. Its why the rhino is absolutely lethal to him in closed spaces but in open space you can damn near guarantee spidey will win. If he's in open space he can move as fast as he wants (which is a lot faster than rogue) not to mention, were talking about someone a lot smarter than rogue too.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
I'm glad you posted. You enabled me to figure out the mystery of why Carver's images were coming out postage-stamp size. You guys are using phones as opposed to laptops, and, for whatever reason, even removing the beginning code, "s4d3" or whatever, isn't enough to correct it for ordinary computers.But the format above works, the "jpg dot html" bit, at least once parsed once more with URLs.
--------------------
It's a "concern in a featureless environment"u because I was assuming this fight was taking place IN an environment WITH some normal features.
Mainly New York City, the setting for most other X-Men versus Spider-Man encounters, save Secret Wars I.
In other words, a place where Spider-Man has the theoretical resources of cover and web-swinging maneuverability afforded by tall buildings.
I REALLY don't see where you guys think he has much chance if he's fighting Rogue in an open field. Not even 3/10. Especially not when a tactic as simple as the following can keep him at bay:
I buy my comics and download it directly from my phone. I then transfer the scans I want to use to photobucket from my photobucket app. The only thing you need to do is click on the tab at the bottom that says "view full site". Exit out of it and then try to pull it up again (the scan). It should work after that.
Originally posted by carver9
I buy my comics and download it directly from my phone. I then transfer the scans I want to use to photobucket from my photobucket app. The only thing you need to do is click on the tab at the bottom that says "view full site". Exit out of it and then try to pull it up again (the scan). It should work after that.
🙁
You used Imageshack for THIS particular thread, though.
No such "view full site" option exists.
