Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes there is. You are sarcastically pretending that since it is a humane way to kill animals we should use it for population control by which you imply the direct opposite, saying that population control of other animals is less cruel, the preferred method being to shoot them. I am asking you therefore if you ever been shot to see if you can make a statement as to the humanity of the preferred population control nowadays that you seem to choose over the (as shown in studies) humane way of killing seals.
You said shoot I didn't, I don't even see anywhere in my posts where I mentioned shooting animals.
I am poking fun at the term "humane" and then bludgeoning animals to death. Would it be humane to bludgeon a human to death if that were in place of seal in the description?
Stop being an ass because you interpreted something incorrectly and added words then made alot of assumptions to further your asinine responses.