Batdude's Tourney Discussion Thread

Originally posted by Soljer
Just read Blair/DC's prep.

5 parts? 😐.

i know... thats just... 😬

Hey, I'm fine with the long writeup. It's counting toward 1 of Blair's posts, so that's about right I guess.

Besides, brevity is the soul of wit, my friends.

😉

Originally posted by Scoobless
And somehow it only counts as 1 extra post.

😬

They could have done a three page write up 😛

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Hey, I'm fine with the long writeup. It's counting toward 1 of Blair's posts, so that's about right I guess.

Besides, brevity is the soul of wit, my friends.

😉

lol, true...

Oh by the way good luck to everyone here and yes I am a Judge
😎

Originally posted by Scoobless
And somehow it only counts as 1 extra post.

😬

The character count is less than 20,000.

Originally posted by batdude123
The character count is less than 20,000.

It's cool ... not like I was gonna go count it or anything.

🙂

Originally posted by batdude123
The character count is less than 20,000.

i was just teasin... damn wrong smileys...

i'm liking both tactics so far, not bad at all...

Is the audience allowed to question the competitors actions?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Is the audience allowed to question the competitors actions?

Short answer: No.

Originally posted by Soljer
Short answer: No.

OK just wondering.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
OK just wondering.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Is the audience allowed to question the competitors actions?

PM them/us if you have questions.

🙂

[edit]

Meh, I don't see anything wrong with posting questions that we could possibly address in future posts. I doubt 1 or 2 would spam things up.

So my word isn't official, but I'd say go ahead SC (or PM like Scoob said).

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Meh, I don't see anything wrong with posting questions that we could possibly address in future posts. I doubt 1 or 2 would spam things up.

So my word isn't official, but I'd say go ahead SC (or PM like Scoob said).

Well, yes, it depends upon the question.

But what we DON'T want asked is something like

Team A: Why are you using this strategy XXXX here? When team B could very easily just do XXXX to counteract it?

You know what I mean? We want to leave the debating to the debaters and keep any sort of outside influence out of it. Hence the short answer of no.

A longer answer would require qualifications for all the separate types of questions that could be asked.

Ah, right.

😮

Yeah any questions from non participants should be PMed to participants

I'm glad I asked first.

I've alreadly PM'd Scoob with my question.

Interesting....I have my "battle plans" already set out, and I already knew that they were going to pull the hammer spinning trick. So yes. I do have a counter 🙂

But I wont post it right now because I cant....on a friends computer just checking it out. Me and DC will be on later to WTFPWN them 😄