Are you a Member of the Dark Side?

Originally posted by queeq
"in my experience there is no such thing as luck."

Originally posted by Alliance
Don't kid yourself.

1st. He was celarly going to die avter the first.
2nd. He combusts like a b!tch.
3. If hes such a tank. Why didn't he just break Kenobi's arm or bunch through him?
4. Maybe he should have been more sensitive to his vulnerabilites (like his apparently spring loaded chest.

Grievious was a worthess incarnation of alien sh!t that deserves no place in Star Wars. He is a lame character, with no depth, nothing more than the Sith employed whore of the day. And he has four arms...appently overcompensating for his lack of everyhting else. Too bad he can't hang onto them for more than 3 seconds

😐

1. I guess we'll never really know

2. I'm sure Kenobi would to if he were shot that many times from a blaster, although his head may not explode

3. He kept moving and squirming like a scalded dog, he was scared (Kenobi)

4. I'll admit I never understood that either, but there must have been a reason, if it were tighter, it may have crushed his chest

Originally posted by Kongu Dude
You have to post less. ermmnone

All your good posts doesn't fit in my profile. ermmhappy

I'll try my best 😛

Originally posted by General G
😐

1. I guess we'll never really know

2. I'm sure Kenobi would to if he were shot that many times from a blaster, although his head may not explode

3. He kept moving and squirming like a scalded dog, he was scared (Kenobi)

4. I'll admit I never understood that either, but there must have been a reason, if it were tighter, it may have crushed his chest

I'll try my best 😛

Originally posted by General G
😐

1. I guess we'll never really know

2. I'm sure Kenobi would to if he were shot that many times from a blaster, although his head may not explode

3. He kept moving and squirming like a scalded dog, he was scared (Kenobi)

4. I'll admit I never understood that either, but there must have been a reason, if it were tighter, it may have crushed his chest

I'll try my best 😛

❌ You fail.

Bad guys in Star Wars are ALWAYS oblivious to their weak spots.

As are the "good" guys.

The bad guys are way more famous for them, from the Death Star exhaust port onwards.

Percieved fame perhaps. Lucas certainly vocalizes one side, but both are clearly present in the Saga.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
The bad guys are way more famous for them, from the Death Star exhaust port onwards.

Ah yes... the port.

Good to see you joined us again, Ush.

Originally posted by Alliance
❌ You fail.

Fail? 🙁

Pass? 🙂

Failing makes me sad, passing makes me happy, so I say I pass.

You fail for not liking Grievous. 🥷

I'm glad I fail at that.

Failure

Originally posted by Alliance
Percieved fame perhaps. Lucas certainly vocalizes one side, but both are clearly present in the Saga.

Only one is presented as being the actual downfall, and what Lucas vocalises IS the saga so that more or less sorts that. Star Wars is not an independantly existing reality- what is perceived is what is so.

What lucas did is say that a coin only has one correct side. Unfortunately for him, he showed two sides of a coin in the film. Despite his own myopic view of his work, its very easy to see the side that apparently Lucas feels does not exist.

Alliance just wants to see it his own way, while his way does not exist. Only LUcas's

Inconsistancies between Lucas's opinons and what he actually filmed is what created my opinons, not the other way around.

I trust the art, not the man.

The man is the art.

Originally posted by General G
Fail? 🙁

Pass? 🙂

Failing makes me sad, passing makes me happy, so I say I pass.

You fail for not liking Grievous. 🥷

Originally posted by queeq
The man is the art.

No. The concept is the art. The films are the art.

What you call inconsistencies exist only in your own mind simply because you do not like the underpinning of Lucas's creation.

It's pure bias and a very, very poor reason to make out that such inconsistencies exist. it makes you look rather feeble.