The Most Beautiful Women In The World

Originally posted by silver_tears
Famke was freaky in Goldeneye tbh, not appealing at all 😖

Yes, I agree. though she is very good looking generally. Her character was supposed to freaky, was it not?

I thought it was supposed to be sexy originally shrug

Originally posted by Bardock42
I find Famke Jansen to be in her league. Also Catherine Zeta-Jones

While Jansen and Jones are definitely attractive/sexy/hot... the "in her league" comment angers Robtard. Bellucci is an 11 on a scale of 1-10.

Originally posted by silver_tears
I thought it was supposed to be sexy originally shrug

Really? I don't recall Goldeneye too well. But she was not what back then would have been called the Bond Girl, right?

Originally posted by Robtard
While Jansen and Jones are definitely attractive/sexy/hot... the "in her league" comment angers Robtard. Bellucci is an 11 on a scale of 1-10.

Well, forgive me, but though I will not deny the undeniable beauty of her I do not think she is out of anyones league.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Really? I don't recall Goldeneye too well. But she was not what back then would have been called the Bond Girl, right?

Nah, she was the evil one.
Xenia Onatopp (haha on top get it haha 😐)

Originally posted by silver_tears
Nah, she was the evil one.
Xenia Onatopp (haha on top get it haha 😐)

Yes, I got it. Unbelievable just how much better the new one was compared with the ones with Pierce Brosnan.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes, I got it. Unbelievable just how much better the new one was compared with the ones with Pierce Brosnan.

Hmmm I don't think the two Bonds are comparable to be honest.

Originally posted by Robtard

[to everyone]
Oh, and objectively speaking, Monica Bellucci is the most beautiful woman in the world, so I don't know why people keep trying. Maybe we should have a "second most beautiful woman" thread.

I don't agree

Originally posted by silver_tears
Hmmm I don't think the two Bonds are comparable to be honest.

Well, they are though. One being really good and one being...oh well.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes, I got it. Unbelievable just how much better the new one was compared with the ones with Pierce Brosnan.

Yea, the new Bond format is exponentially better than the old.

Originally posted by Mr. Sandman
I don't agree

You really should.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, they are though. One being really good and one being...oh well.

No, one being brute force and the other being suave smoothness.
Both are awesome, but not comparable me thinks.
I mean if you look at Goldeneye it has more of a Casino Royale feel when looking at Bond's methods.

Originally posted by silver_tears
No, one being brute force and the other being suave smoothness.
Both are awesome, but not comparable me thinks.
I mean if you look at Goldeneye it has more of a Casino Royale feel when looking at Bond's methods.

...I don't follow.

Originally posted by silver_tears
No, one being brute force and the other being suave smoothness.
Both are awesome, but not comparable me thinks.
I mean if you look at Goldeneye it has more of a Casino Royale feel when looking at Bond's methods.

You missed the point of it then... Casino Royal is Bond rebooted, they want to show how he matures into the roll of super-spy-suave-womanizer. The next flick with Craig will probably have Bond being less the thug. Though I was damn happy to finally see Bond kick some ass instead of some lame hand-chop to the neck move.

Originally posted by Robtard
You missed the point of it then... Casino Royal is Bond rebooted, they want to show how he matures into the roll of super-spy-suave-womanizer. The next flick with Craig will probably have Bond being less the thug. Though I was damn happy to finally see Bond kick some ass instead of some lame hand-chop to the neck move.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Actually apparently he is supposed t go on a revenge tour or something. Doesn't sound too good. But well, we'll see.

The franchise finally has a winner with Daniel Craig, it will be a shame if they ruin it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
...I don't follow.

Hmm alright, looking at Casino Royale, Bond is just sheer power no?
Brute force, chasing down the bad guys, not giving a damn about any sissy drinks etc right?
Well Pierce Brosnan grew to be a more refined, suave, classy Bond, like in the opening of The World is Not Enough for example.
However, in Goldeneye he is somewhat comparable to the Bond in Casino Royale imo, sheer force, chasing down the bad guys etc, but as his films went on he evolved into the refined Bond, which is what I think will happen to Craig, I mean the end of Royale pretty much asserts as much what with the suit and the whole "Bond, James Bond" line emerging.
So therefore I think the two are completely different Bonds, and neither is better since they're different to start with.
I also recommend watching Goldeneye because it's my favourite ever. doped

Originally posted by Robtard
You missed the point of it then... Casino Royal is Bond rebooted, they want to show how he matures into the roll of super-spy-suave-womanizer. The next flick with Craig will probably have Bond being less the thug. Though I was damn happy to finally see Bond kick some ass instead of some lame hand-chop to the neck move.

Err that's exactly why I said the two can't be compared because their styles are different.
It seems you missed the point of my post 😕

Originally posted by silver_tears
I also recommend watching Goldeneye because it's my favourite ever. doped

There's a porno spin-off called "Browneye", I recommend that one too.