Originally posted by wuTa
believe me, I would if I could.
oh, i believe you... 😛
Originally posted by LethalFemme
Really? Its so weird seeing how different guys taste are. I mean you hear some guys say "We're not all the same" but, then they'll still **** any ***** that pays them the littlest bit of attention. Its kinda refreshing honestly.
😆
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
She looks non-sexual to me.Like a nice building.
😆
i actually read about that dita show, and i had considered watching it, but it honestly didnt feel that interested... the woman's waist (corset or no), is way too thin compared to her proportions... at least imo...
as for lady di and the whole concept of beauty, i think there have been some beautiful women in this thread (and i mean beautiful, not just hot), but saying di was this and that without actually knowing her is a bit ott imo... she did alot for charity, but she married prince charles... not exactly stellar judgement on her part was it... 😬
Originally posted by vintageSW77She looks mean...... 🙁
someone totally ruined the thread with the saint Di pics
she didnt mean shit to me
who cares
the only reason people picked up on her so called beauty is because she was the only royal family member who was semi human lookingneeds a bit of darkness back in here
Originally posted by Bardock42
Good for us...you I mean. That still isn't clear.Yeah. Then again some here can't.
That's the thing that's fascinating, this whole range of preference, I mean most of us agree on which of these ladies are beautiful, and then there's a few who are completely different from the norm. I suppose beauty really is in the eye of the beholder. 😛
Originally posted by silver_tears
That's the thing that's fascinating, this whole range of preference, I mean most of us agree on which of these ladies are beautiful, and then there's a few who are completely different from the norm. I suppose beauty really is in the eye of the beholder. 😛
Well obviously, I am just saying I am right.
Originally posted by silver_tearsOkay I really hate getting into discussion like this on the net but ok.
Wrong you are, such a thread exists, and most of the men are fully clothed, the majority of the pictures are facial shots if I remember correctly. That's what beauty is measured on, the face, more precisely symmetry of face, that's what we are drawn to. Obviously each person's definition of beauty is different but it's mostly facial.Since normal society tends to wear clothes, much less today then centuries ago of course, true beauty is not evaluated on the ass or legs, people in Victorian times were not so fortunate as we are to all this exposure 🙄.
Someone can be boner inducing from behind and then you get a look at her face and she's hideous, so her ass or legs don't make her beautiful. Not to mention it's rather rude to say you vomited at Lady Di's pics. She may not be what you find beautiful but she is still dead, and as for her being a beautiful soul, her numerous works of charity tend to cast her in that light, least should have showed some courtesy in those respects and been more sensitive there. 😬
Although I feel it's rude to say you vomit at anyone's pics to start with. Ever been taught "If you have nothing nice to say, say nothing."?
Now go ahead and get all defensive as I know you probably will.
1.Charity work does not make you a "Beautiful person" not that its any of your buisness or anybody else's but I'm a joe nobody I do quite a bit charity work I also donate money to three different orgs I dont consider my self beautiful I'm just somebody trying to help. Ok 2 she's not my cup of tea I think she is quite ugly its my opinon deal with it. This thread is fun people poking jabs at each other over there choices nobody takes this seriously if they do they need to get off the forums and get a life. Now natalie portman I like the other I do not can you deal with that?
Originally posted by Bardock42
That's what this thread is about. Outer beauty. Who we find attractive. And if Punky finds her to be beautiful in that way I am fine with it, but I think I have the right to say that I don't agree. Even if a rude manner, though I wouldn't do that, cause...it is rude.I am into athletic half naked women...so I prefer to see them.
We cam start a thread about the nicest or most inner beautiful women though, I'd be happy to learn about some famous ones, as I have just realized I know none that I would consider that.
The thread is about "beautiful" women. A word which has argueably been horribly misused throughout the pages of the thread. Since when has it been established that sexiness absolutely and always equals beauty in all sense of the word? There are many women out there who are boner inducing alright but i'd never dub them beautiful. Flagrant display of their sexual assets makes them sexy in all their right but beautiful?
give me a break.
Beauty is an idea that perhaps encompasses sexual appeal but is NOT limited to, or dominated by it.
And Lady Di is the most beautiful public figure I have seen so far. This is not a thread about "inner beauty" and so i did not post the photos based on that factor. Regardless of how astonishingly beautiful a person she was in that sense too.
So fact of the matter is, Diana was indeed blessed with physical gorgeousness. And she carried it with so much grace, elegance and truth that it would be a shame to disregard her when such a topic as this comes up.
Originally posted by chris_64256
Okay I really hate getting into discussion like this on the net but ok.
I will ask you the say thing I asked the other girl did you know Di?
Everybody always brings up what a great person she was becuae she did charity like I'm suppose to be impressed guess what hun alot of people donate there time, money to help other people. They are not royalty They work, have familys, have to cook, clean etc. Di never had a job in her life had every meal cooked for her was drove around and had a hell of alot of time on her hands she did not sacrifice shit but yet when she did cameras were there to capute her doing "charity" she was not special other than she was born into special circumstances so get that shit out of my face..1.Charity work does not make you a "Beautiful person" not that its any of your buisness or anybody else's but I'm a joe nobody I do quite a bit charity work I also donate money to three different orgs I dont consider my self beautiful I'm just somebody trying to help. Ok 2 she's not my cup of tea I think she is quite ugly its my opinon deal with it. This thread is fun people poking jabs at each other over there choices nobody takes this seriously if they do they need to get off the forums and get a life. Now natalie portman I like the other I do not can you deal with that?
ugh. please.
🙄
to begin with, this thread is NOT about inherent charcter traits. The photos were posted NOT to refer to that aspect of Lady Di's personality.
What are you getting your underwear all twisted over? Because a beautiful person can't be a "nice" person too? Is that what you seem to be implying because I posted someone who's existence did not depend on the strutting of her privates?!