Originally posted by Starhawk
Hey tell your best friend that joke. I'm sure he'd love it.
wow, after all your crying about indirect joking about general issues, you now make a direct jab at someone who lost his friend?
you're a sick **** dude. i may be a tasteless bastard, but i would never be so dark and personal with my jabs.
160. (1) Every person who commits bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) Every person who compels another to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), every person who, in the presence of a person under the age of fourteen years, commits bestiality or who incites a person under the age of fourteen years to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term no exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. [R.S.C. 1985, c.19 (3rd Supp.), s.3]
Does Section 160 of the Criminal Code make you feel ... hot?
Originally posted by Gregory
160. (1) Every person who commits bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.(2) Every person who compels another to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), every person who, in the presence of a person under the age of fourteen years, commits bestiality or who incites a person under the age of fourteen years to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term no exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. [R.S.C. 1985, c.19 (3rd Supp.), s.3]
Does Section 160 of the Criminal Code make you feel ... hot?
Bestiality is legal in Washington though... Depending on where he lives in Canada, it might not be that far of a drive over the border and into a sexy goats anus.
Originally posted by Robtard
Only someone suffering from chronic anal-spasms would make that connection. You sir are a proven idiot and by your own doing no less.
No how you people have acted on this thread is what makes me hate, yes I do hate these things for what they do to kids who should just be able to live a happy life never knowing what kind of things are out there.
I just want people to be able to live without fear and pain. That's why I want to be a crown attorney.
Originally posted by StarhawkWhich is an argument for the death penalty how? Oh it's not.
No how you people have acted on this thread is what makes me hate, yes I do hate these things for what they do to kids who should just be able to live a happy life never knowing what kind of things are out there.
Originally posted by Starhawk(Notwithstanding the irony of putting "I want to make the world better" in the same sentence as "I want to be a lawyer"😉 The inability to form a cogent argument will see that you likely won't achieve this, and the world a better place for it.
I just want people to be able to live without fear and pain. That's why I want to be a crown attorney.
Originally posted by Starhawk
No how you people have acted on this thread is what makes me hate, yes I do hate these things for what they do to kids who should just be able to live a happy life never knowing what kind of things are out there.I just want people to be able to live without fear and pain. That's why I want to be a crown attorney.
Lets see:
1) Pittman post an anecdote about his childhood friends horrible experience and expresses remorse over it.
2) Pittman makes a joke about PVS wanting to be buttf####d by a wolf and a donkey (in that order).
3) You somehow connect the two and come to the conclusion that Pittman found it funny with what happened to his friend.
You see, a normal person would be able to distinguish between a real-life horrible experience, a joke between two Internet friends/rivals and see that there is no connection.
You failed to do so, therefore you proved yourself the idiot.
Did I miss anything guys?