Originally posted by StarhawkHowever the murder rate is supposed to be less in Canada then the US so how can this be if 90% of all kidnapping lead to death? The figures do not add up so that would lead anyone to believe that you have the information wrong.
Perhaps they were talking about the statistics in Canada.
Originally posted by StarhawkIt is not the same fight, you said you don't make things up and I have proven that you do. You said that 90% of kidnapping leads to murder but I have shown that in the US that it is not even close to that but you say it must be in Canada but the murder rate their is lower so that mean that what you remember being taught in class is wrong. I doubt that you teacher is giving you wrong information but that you either remembered wrong or skewed the information to your own favor. You have not provided one sliver of proof to anything that you have said and I have called you out on each and every one.
No just why recycle the same fight over and over again?
Just in case you think that Canada doesn’t have a lower homicide rate.
http://www.npb-cnlc.gc.ca/reports/pdf/pls_2002/08_e.htm
Originally posted by StarhawkFrom my old post
And what about a child kiddnapping rate? now compare the number of children in canada who are kiddnapped and the number of them that are sexualy assualted and compare the number that survive.
“In the United States about 800,000 children reported missing each year, 99% are found through law enforcement efforts, according to FBI statistics. Now granted this includes everything from the classic case of kidnapping to runaways but only 200 to 300 are under the classical kidnapping. Another 3,200 to 4,600 are taken for shorter periods, have something done to them, often a sexual assault of some type, and are then released according to National Incidence Study of Missing, Exploited, Runaway and Throwaway Children (NISMART).”
Simply do the math, if the rate is higher in the US then how can they have a higher homicide rate when it comes to children? You are talking about nearly a 100% difference. What Canada does lead the US in is rape.
You show me where it says that 90% of children are killed. I have provided you with proof so it is put up or shut up.
Originally posted by StarhawkFor one I don’t have the stats for Canada but you seem to but I don’t need them. Murder rate in the US is higher but you are saying that it isn’t so prove it.
You havent provided me with proof thats relevant to Canada.My question to you is what is the % of sexually assulted child kidnap victims that survive in Canada?
Originally posted by StarhawkI’m not the one saying that it is higher, YOU are. I have shown that 99% of the missing children are recovered and the numbers to back it up and the sources of that information. What have you provided? What you “remember” in class, I say BS. You live in Canada, you are taking law courses and it was your teacher that “said” this so YOU should have the textbook, notes or whatever to backup YOUR claim.
then find out thisMy question to you is what is the % of sexually assulted child kidnap victims that survive in Canada?
Unless your scared I will be proven right.
Originally posted by ThePittman
I’m not the one saying that it is higher, YOU are. I have shown that 99% of the missing children are recovered and the numbers to back it up and the sources of that information. What have you provided? What you “remember” in class, I say BS. You live in Canada, you are taking law courses and it was your teacher that “said” this so YOU should have the textbook, notes or whatever to backup YOUR claim.
You claim Im wrong about it? find out that info and if I am i will say so. Unless your afraid I'm right.
Originally posted by StarhawkI am God; find out the info to prove me wrong. I'm tired and tired of dealing with your stupidity, I’m not afraid of anything from you but you are not worth my time anymore and you could keep the aspirin companies in business with the headaches you cause.
You claim Im wrong about it? find out that info and if I am i will say so. Unless your afraid I'm right.
Originally posted by StarhawkWell, that just gave you defeat right there.
He says I'm wrong he can prove it, If he does I will admit it.
You have no proof. You are claiming things you cannot actually back up.
Why does Pittman have to do all the work, while you sit there, and claim a bunch of shit, and just tell him to prove you wrong.
If your going to claim something, get proof, get a reference, get something to back up your claims.
You think you are going to get the death penalty back, with that kind of excuse. Jeeze are you ever going to make the shittiest case ever!
Horrible.
Pitt never claimed anything, it was you! The burden of proof is on you!
If you can't back up what you say, then at least try to find it, either that, or shut-up!
How about this:
It works both ways.
If your studying law, then you should know that you need proof, instead of empty statements, and telling someone else to go and prove you wrong, while you have nothing.
You can't prove anything without proof, in which, you have nothing of the sort.
You have no proof, therefore there is nothing to disprove.