What's worse: Pedophiles or Murderers?

*sneeze*

oops...sorry. well, its still a worthy topic

Originally posted by Schecter
*sneeze*

oops...sorry. well, its still a worthy topic

Do you really think people are still waiting for Starhawk's proof... the debate ending, earth scattering, universal-truth proof his "professor" is supposedly [still] emailing him. Oh wait, I know, he'll just post "I posted it, it's there!" *squawk*

indeed.

Originally posted by Starhawk
I have e-mailed my professor for the information. When I get it I will give you not only the messege but his e-mail addy as well so you can confirm.

He shares my beliefs as far as murderers but not pedophiles.

im sure he wont avoid it though 🙄
he must have simply forgotten 🙄

Guys, when you act immature like this how does it strengthen your case? This thread is 4 months old. Are you that petty? Yes back then I did get research done. And then I got into a fight with another member and got banned for awhile. Then I stopped going on for awhile.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Guys, when you act immature like this how does it strengthen your case? This thread is 4 months old. Are you that petty? Yes back then I did get research done. And then I got into a fight with another member and got banned for awhile. Then I stopped going on for awhile.

yeah, that doesnt concern us. what does concern us is that cliffhanger you left us on. so what did this professor have to say?>

Originally posted by Starhawk
Guys, when you act immature like this how does it strengthen your case? This thread is 4 months old. Are you that petty? Yes back then I did get research done. And then I got into a fight with another member and got banned for awhile. Then I stopped going on for awhile.

At least in my few exchanges with you, you do not provide evidence of factual claims - just say it is. I think that is the point

Originally posted by chithappens
At least in my few exchanges with you, you do not provide evidence of factual claims - just say it is. I think that is the point

LOL... Go look at his "gay culture" claim... You nailed him dead on.

Originally posted by Schecter
yeah, that doesnt concern us. what does concern us is that cliffhanger you left us on. so what did this professor have to say?>

What concerns you is not my life's work. And I will have to look into it, it was 4 months ago. You guys need to get lives is this is still the driving force of your existence.

Originally posted by Robtard
LOL... Go look at his "gay culture" claim... You nailed him dead on.

LOL, just read through it quickly and got a good laugh. I could see if it was logical "my opinion" sort of stuff, but his post lack substance because the claims have to be proven with facts.

I made that mistake with the VA Tech shooter by trusting the damn "Today Show" and half the crap they said was not the same 12 hours later.

Checking sources is so important...bangin

Originally posted by Starhawk
What concerns you is not my life's work. And I will have to look into it, it was 4 months ago. You guys need to get lives is this is still the driving force of your existence.

so in other words you were lying? or do you expect us to believe that you forgot? hurling insults at us in neither intelligent nor exhbiting higher learning. i asked a simple question, and all you can do is avoid the question and insult me? i thought you didnt do that sort of thing?

What part of it was 4 months ago are you having trouble getting?

Originally posted by Starhawk
I have e-mailed my professor for the information. When I get it I will give you not only the messege but his e-mail addy as well so you can confirm.

He shares my beliefs as far as murderers but not pedophiles.

so then you were lying. thanks for clearing that up.

Originally posted by Schecter
so then you were lying. thanks for clearing that up.

LOL because I don't have instant recall of something that happened 4 months ago? I'm glad your not into law, you'd never win a single case.

PVS, he's a Law Student (that's how Robtard does it, right?). You can't win; he's get the book learnin' on his side!

Originally posted by FeceMan
PVS,

THAT NAME no longer has any meaning for me!!!

(and no, its not the name of my true self that i've only forgotten. SHUT UP!!!!)

Schecter, give him the benefit of the doubt, it's not like every claim he makes will have an [irrelevant] Wiki article he can reference as his only proof.

As opposed to your claims that are only backed up by petty and immature insults?

Originally posted by FeceMan
PVS, he's a Law Student (that's how Robtard does it, right?). You can't win; he's get the book learnin' on his side!

Not only is he a "Law Student"; he's also "Well-educated" and an "Intellectual" to boot.

Originally posted by Starhawk
As opposed to your claims that are only backed up by petty and immature insults?

We've covered that already... saying "you fail" isn't an insult, it's an observation. You made a claim and when asked to support it you did:

1) Ignored the question (initially)
2) Then repeatedly claimed you answered it, when you hadn't.
3) After several dodges and spins, you posted a Wiki article that was irrelevant.

So, it's safe to say "You Failed" as fact.

I think anyone with a pittance of intelligence will agree that if "you" make a claim, you need to support that claim (or shut up). No?

Originally posted by Robtard
We've covered that already... saying "you fail" isn't an insult, it's an observation. You made a claim and when asked to support it you did:

1) Ignored the question (initially)
2) Then repeatedly claimed you answered it, when you hadn't.
3) After several dodges and spins, you posted a Wiki article that was irrelevant.

So, it's safe to say "You Failed" as fact.

I think anyone with a pittance of intelligence will agree that if "you" make a claim, you need to support that claim (or shut up). No?

I don't think there is many people with that quality on here. Just because you don't like or understand an answer doesn't mean it wasn't given. I did answer it, it's not my fault you either don't like it or can't recognize it. I used the article because I am not gay myself and thusly did not want to step on any toes.