Oh mine, it's not far that we can live to 140

Started by ysh2272 pages

Oh mine, it's not far that we can live to 140

Oh mine, it's not far that we can live to 140

Article was published at: http://thebestworld.forumable.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=550&mforum=thebestworld#550

By Steve Hargreaves
Special to CNN

Adjust font size:
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Imagine a world with no cancer, Alzheimer's disease or diabetes, where people routinely live to be 140 years old.

Although outside conventional medical opinion, that world may be just a couple of decades away, according to James Canton, author of a new book, "The Extreme Future: The Top Trends That Will Reshape the World for the Next 5, 10, and 20 Years."

Canton, who has served as a consultant on future trends for clients including Motorola and the White House, said advances in information technology, biotechnology, neuroscience, and nanotechnology will allow for radical advances in medicine and the treatment of diseases.

"Once medicine becomes boldly proactive, then you're talking about eliminating 70, 80 percent of diseases," Canton said in an interview. "We're just on the edge of this. It's going to happen very shortly."

Canton uses proprietary quantitative and qualitative market research to forecast trends on the future. He currently serves as a senior fellow at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management and is an adviser to the National Science Foundation.

Canton believes that the mapping of the human genome will allow doctors to peer into our medical futures, disable disease-causing genes or pinpoint exactly when an organ will fail.

Replacing that organ would be much easier than it is today, he claims, as genetic engineering will allow organs to be grown and harvested, eliminating the need for long waiting lists.

And advances in medications will refresh the brain, warding off aliments like Alzheimer's or other afflictions that have already set in, he said.

"Cancer and diabetes will be managed diseases in a decade," said Canton. Managing those diseases should lead to gradually increasing life spans, he said. Eventually, Canton said, "Birthday parties for people who are 120, 140 will be commonplace."

But there are doubters who say Canton is not presenting an accurate picture of the future.

"I think that's a pretty optimistic assessment," said Michael Smyer, director of the Center for Aging and Work at Boston College. "We're making progress, but ... that progress is not in the next 10 or 15 years."

Anne Newman, a professor of epidemiology and medicine at the University of Pittsburgh, said some genetic manipulation in other animals has led to dramatic increases in life span. But manipulating genes to increase the human life span is not being done, she said. Instead, the emphasis is on treating diseases.

'We feel like we have a revolution going on, but it won't be so extreme," she said. "We've increased the number of people getting old, but we haven't increased the life span of the species. The average [age] has been increasing because more people are being given a chance to get there."

The National Center for Health Statistics, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said a man born in 2004 is expected to live 75.2 years, while a woman is expected to live 80.4 years.

The agency stressed these are not projections, but estimates based on current mortality rates.

Canton said the baby boomer generation is the driving force behind advances in medicine. Eyeing the boomer's wealth, companies from across the medical spectrum are pouring money into drugs and technologies of all kinds that will help people live longer lives, Canton said. Whether they will succeed in increasing the human life span appears to be an open question.

"It's quite debatable and fun to argue," said Newman.

Canton believes the human life span will increase and that the ensuing societal changes will be monumental.

"This is the big one," he said. "This makes the Internet seem small."

None of that will happen because just like the shut down of stem cell research, Republicans will actually use God... as an excuse to kill other people.

will not happen in Japan

Why in the world would we need people to live until 140?
The world's overpopulated as it is. There's nothing noble about clinging to life. Live it while you have the chance, don't try to beat nature.

Try to say the similar thing to some people who don't give a damn about god--chinese and japanese

Re: Oh mine, it's not far that we can live to 140

Bullshit.

Originally posted by ysh227
Try to say the similar thing to some people who don't give a damn about god--chinese and japanese

What the hell did you just say?

140? maybe, if the world is around like a few hundred years from now, with cybernetic transplants.

This is bullshit , the man is a fool.

Harvesting organs ? Hah ! While intelligent as that is, the 'God-Warriros' (yes I'm talking to all you who worship the invisible deity ) wouldn't allow it. Because fetus's which can't stick up from themselves apparently need to be saved....

Cybernetic implants......... 😑

But but, I wouldn't feel quite myself.........lol

Originally posted by grey fox
This is bullshit , the man is a fool.

Harvesting organs ? Hah ! While intelligent as that is, the 'God-Warriros' (yes I'm talking to all you who worship the invisible deity ) wouldn't allow it. Because fetus's which can't stick up from themselves apparently need to be saved....

you stole my post damnit!

Originally posted by silver_tears
Why in the world would we need people to live until 140?
The world's overpopulated as it is. There's nothing noble about clinging to life. Live it while you have the chance, don't try to beat nature.

dont try to beat nature? so if all diseases could be cured that would be a defiance of nature? so, if someone gets sick and goes to the doctor they're trying to beat nature as well?

i don't think i can stand living up to 90, much less 140

Originally posted by silver_tears
Why in the world would we need people to live until 140?
The world's overpopulated as it is. There's nothing noble about clinging to life. Live it while you have the chance, don't try to beat nature.
We try and beat nature each and every day with medicine, improved food and nutrition. These things have been used to surpass the normal “only the fit survive” for decades.

Originally posted by ThePittman
We try and beat nature each and every day with medicine, improved food and nutrition. These things have been used to surpass the normal “only the fit survive” for decades.

sometimes i wonder if we should've been extinct by now

decades? thats it?

Originally posted by PVS
decades? thats it?
Maybe centuries was a better term, but you get my drift.

Originally posted by Kayne Archeron
sometimes i wonder if we should've been extinct by now

No, because we did evolve to this point so therefore we did survive however the question would be will be survive our own intelligence and technology.

We don't need no stinkin chemical enhancements or cyborg parts just ask Jack Lalane and use his juicer juicing machine, then tow a bunch of boats in a bay with your wang!

just do this and you'll live to 160:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYFuQXkXErg

Originally posted by PVS
decades? thats it?

More like never. The lifespan of the average American is 75, and in a short period of time it will be double that? Bullshit!

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
More like never. The lifespan of the average American is 75, and in a short period of time it will be double that? Bullshit!
I think he was referring to me saying that we have been increasing our life span and I originally said decades but meant centuries. The average life span has been increasing a little each decade with the advancement of medical technology and through the advancement of nutrition and diet.