Odin, King Thor, and Loki versus Galactus

Galactus is not hungry. No prep.

How do you look your Asgardian?

Bloody-as-Hell or Burnt-to-a-Crisp?

Originally posted by masterbruce
Galactus is not hungry. No prep.

Originally posted by bigbran
It is basically impossible for Odin and King Thor to be in the same battle.

assume a cosmic event made this impossible into reality.

Originally posted by bigbran
It is basically impossible for Odin and King Thor to be in the same battle.

Let's just assume they draw the Odin Power from different realities, kay?

Regardless, Galactus stomps them.

Originally posted by Soljer
Let's just assume they draw the Odin Power from different realities, kay?

Regardless, Galactus stomps them.

It wouldn't even be close? This isn't a fullpower Galactus, just one that isn't starving.

Normal Galactus is =< Celestial.

Skyfathers can't beat Galactus(if he isn't weak)

They win, Odin should take a majority by himself against Galactus. King thor and Loki are just useful distractions here.

Well written one all 3 wouldnt stand a chance even 3/4, full feed one..lol

Galactus 10/10

Well written against your average Galactus? The team takes the majority, if not 10/10.

Galactus highest showings aren't much greater than Odin's highest showings, based of this the team takes the healthy majority.

Originally posted by Soujaboy
Well written against your average Galactus? The team takes the majority, if not 10/10.

Galactus highest showings aren't much greater than Odin's highest showings, based of this the team takes the healthy majority.

😐 Yeah they are.

Sending out waves through the multiverse is hardly shit to Galactus.

Originally posted by Soljer
😐 Yeah they are.

Sending out waves through the multiverse is hardly shit to Galactus.

Yet a god blast is 😖hifty:

Like I've said before, Galactus power isn't much greater than Odin's. Galactus has destroyed galaxies, realities, planets, etc in battles, and so has Odin. Odin has battles that Have spanned the entire universe in mere moments, destroying countless planets, and recreating suns. He may not be as powerful as Galactus, but he isn't far from him.

It even seems that the writers agree...

Originally posted by Soujaboy
Yet a god blast is 😖hifty:

Like I've said before, Galactus power isn't much greater than Odin's. Galactus has destroyed galaxies, realities, planets, etc in battles, and so has Odin. Odin has battles that Have spanned the entire universe in mere moments, destroying countless planets, and recreating suns. He may not be as powerful as Galactus, but he isn't far from him.

It even seems that the writers agree...

The writers agreed.

Thirty years ago. 😐.

Originally posted by Soljer
The writers agreed.

Thirty years ago. 😐.

There have been no retconns or changes in continuity. Thus what goes then, goes now.

Maybe there hasnt been changes of continuity, but Thanos had clones, Doom had doombots and at times there are things that need to be fixed in the universe and there is no subtle way to fix them.

I call Galactus hunger at one of those things.

Originally posted by Bentley
Maybe there hasnt been changes of continuity, but Thanos had clones, Doom had doombots and at times there are things that need to be fixed in the universe and there is no subtle way to fix them.

I call Galactus hunger at one of those things.

?

Ok, translation: Some writers did a crappy job writing Galactus back in the day, mostly to make some characters sound cool (Thor, Sentry, others...); to give some of his glory back to the good old world devourer they said that he is weaker when he is hungry, and thus his low showings are explained.

My last post means to explain this, and to say that just because things are in current continuity they may not always be valid in the context in which they were writen back then.

Originally posted by Bentley
Ok, translation: Some writers did a crappy job writing Galactus back in the day, mostly to make some characters sound cool (Thor, Sentry, others...); to give some of his glory back to the good old world devourer they said that he is weaker when he is hungry, and thus his low showings are explained.

My last post means to explain this, and to say that just because things are in current continuity they may not always be valid in the context in which they were writen back then.

Yes they are, unless stated otherwise.

it may have been written 30 years ago but it only took place in Marvel continuity like 15-20 years ago.