Imperiex (Prime) Vs Galactus (Full Power)

Started by Space M ummy2 pages
Originally posted by juggernaut66666
What are you talking about?
Imperiex wasn't evil he thought that it was his purpose to release the Big bang and at the end he did it under his own power he didn't need anything to do it.

Hitler wasn't evil, he thought it was just his purpose to exterminate the jews and genetically purify germany and dominate europe.

See what I did there?

Originally posted by Space M ummy
Hitler wasn't evil, he thought it was just his purpose to exterminate the jews and genetically purify germany and dominate europe.

See what I did there?


In that case Galactus is also evil since he eats planets where people live .

To me is a lot like this: Galactus is a force of nature, Imperiex is an individual. No idividuals can defeat true forces of nature unless there is a factor involved (I'm looking at your Guantlet Thanos).

Imperiex thought that he was a force of nature and thus he wanted to destroy the universe, this is no different than the Hitler example. Galactus in the other hand, is what he is and there is no need for him to prove anything.

Originally posted by juggernaut66666
In that case Galactus is also evil since he eats planets where people live .

No, because Galactus is necessary for the survival of the marvel universe. If Galactus DIDNT consume planets, he would die, and the marvel universe would die with him. This is why he was immune to the omega effect- as a "necessity" he could NOT be "removed from the source" so to speak.

is "death" (the abstract) evil, because it kills people? No, because death is a necessity. Existence without death would be far worse than the alternative. It is the same with Galactus.

It's also been strongly hinted at that at the end of this existence, galactus will release the power he's absorbed and "renew" the entire universe, giving back more than he's ever taken.

an "evil" galactus would consume indescriminately just because he could, If you know anything about Galactus, this isn't the case- he goes out of his way to contain his power as much as possible.

all of this is a moot point anyway. consensus is that galactus totally ownz your dood. 😄 Also, the ultimate nullifier is just another aspect of galactus. That thing can kill anything, anywhere in the blink of an eye- even entire multiverses.

Imperiex is nothing against it. game over!

Originally posted by Space M ummy
No, because Galactus is necessary for the survival of the marvel universe. If Galactus DIDNT consume planets, he would die, and the marvel universe would die with him. This is why he was immune to the omega effect- as a "necessity" he could NOT be "removed from the source" so to speak.

is "death" (the abstract) evil, because it kills people? No, because death is a necessity. Existence without death would be far worse than the alternative. It is the same with Galactus.

It's also been strongly hinted at that at the end of this existence, galactus will release the power he's absorbed and "renew" the entire universe, giving back more than he's ever taken.

an "evil" galactus would consume indescriminately just because he could, If you know anything about Galactus, this isn't the case- he goes out of his way to contain his power as much as possible.


Yeah forgot that my bad.. 😮

Originally posted by juggernaut66666
Yeah forgot that my bad.. 😮

The Ultimate Nullifier is considered standard equipment for Galactus - as it is part of him, the same way that Silver Surfer's board is part of Silver Surfer. One push of the Ultimate Nullifier button, and Galactus can erase nearly any being in the multiverse with but a thought. Full Powered Galactus using the Ultimate Nullifier would obliterate even the anti-monitor in but an instant.

Yeah I agree now that I've read this over. Galactus would probably win.

Imperiex might acutaly be a good enough meal to keep Big G from needing to feed.

Originally posted by Mr Master
In what issue did this happen?

Phoenix preserving or saving Galactus?

Its most likely in one of the X titles. I have seen scans and seen people cite it quite often. I'll ask around and follow up with some specifics this weekend.

you can probably get scans however by googling for it.

WHy not just make an Eternity vs. Imperiex thread since that is what Galactus basically has to become to be that powerful. Imperiex wrecks universes. This match is inconclusive cuz I have never seen FP Galactus and Imperiex sucked.

Ion whoops them both.

Then he resurrects them in the Image universe.

Hilariousness ensues.

Originally posted by Avalonofthewind
Ion whoops them both.

Then he resurrects them in the Image universe.

Hilariousness ensues.

Co-signed.

Originally posted by Avalonofthewind
Ion whoops them both.

Then he resurrects them in the Image universe.

Hilariousness ensues.

😆

Originally posted by thtadthtshldntb
Its most likely in one of the X titles. I have seen scans and seen people cite it quite often. I'll ask around and follow up with some specifics this weekend. you can probably get scans however by googling for it.

Actually, I'm only asking to see what you would respond with.

The FACT is Phoenix NEVER had anything to do with Galactus's Origin On Panel.

That's a fallacy made up by bio writers, who monkey wrenched the Phoenix into Galactus's History due to executive decisions made by suits that know nothing about how seriously Comic Book Readers consider continuity.

The reality On Panel:

Galactus's Origin has been depicted THREE times On Panel, NEVER ONCE, was Phoenix mentioned.

If you can find me just ONE comic where this is drawn, I'll agree with you, but since I know your basing this idea on bios or handbooks I know you can't.

Tell me where if anywhere does it mention Phoenix supposedly "enabling Galen to incubate in the Cosmic Egg"....how about even JUST Saving Galactus...

This is the ORIGINAL depiction of Galactus's ORIGIN.

This is the SECOND time they depicted Galactus's Origin On Panel.

And this is the Third:

See anything different, yea me neither.

In ALL THREE instances, Eternity or the sentience of the Universe saved Galactus NOT Phoenix, the biatch isn't even Mentioned.

By the way, Do not be confused by the Third depiction, where the sentience is called "the ENIGMA FORCE"

The Enigma Force is what powers Captain Universe, and Captain Universe is the ESSENCE of the UNIVERSE, if He DIES...EVERYONE DIES.

Look hard...and realize Phoenix is NOT even mentioned during the Galactus history lesson.

Originally posted by Bentley
To me is a lot like this: Galactus is a force of nature, Imperiex is an individual. No idividuals can defeat true forces of nature unless there is a factor involved (I'm looking at your Guantlet Thanos).

Imperiex thought that he was a force of nature and thus he wanted to destroy the universe, this is no different than the Hitler example. Galactus in the other hand, is what he is and there is no need for him to prove anything.

Imperiex is not a individual at all.. 😕 . He is a force nature, and is the embodiment of Entropy. He was created to destroy the DCU by God. Galactus isn't going to 'chow down' on Imperiex Prime at all. Imperiex doesn't need Hollowers, they just make everything so much simpler. My guess is the battle will last millions of years until Imperiex finally drains Galactus of his energy.. 😎

Originally posted by Mr Master
Actually, I'm only asking to see what you would respond with.

The FACT is Phoenix NEVER had anything to do with Galactus's Origin On Panel.

That's a fallacy made up by bio writers, who monkey wrenched the Phoenix into Galactus's History due to executive decisions made by suits that know nothing about how seriously Comic Book Readers consider continuity.

The reality On Panel:

Galactus's Origin has been depicted THREE times On Panel, NEVER ONCE, was Phoenix mentioned.

If you can find me just ONE comic where this is drawn, I'll agree with you, but since I know your basing this idea on bios or handbooks I know you can't.

Tell me where if anywhere does it mention Phoenix supposedly "enabling Galen to incubate in the Cosmic Egg"....how about even JUST Saving Galactus...

This is the ORIGINAL depiction of Galactus's ORIGIN.

This is the SECOND time they depicted Galactus's Origin On Panel.

And this is the Third:

See anything different, yea me neither.

In ALL THREE instances, Eternity or the sentience of the Universe saved Galactus NOT Phoenix, the biatch isn't even Mentioned.

By the way, Do not be confused by the Third depiction, where the sentience is called "the ENIGMA FORCE"

The Enigma Force is what powers Captain Universe, and Captain Universe is the ESSENCE of the UNIVERSE, if He DIES...EVERYONE DIES.

Look hard...and realize Phoenix is NOT even mentioned during the Galactus history lesson.

Here this entry references some issues. As I have said, I will ask around this weekend.

The reference above refers so a FF Handbook, which presumably counts until retconed, and an X-Men series.

Originally posted by thtadthtshldntb
Here this entry references some issues. As I have said, I will ask around this weekend.

You will ask,

but you will find no answers.

Believe me, I've researched the matter thoroughly.

It's just that when people say Phoenix was involved in Big G's origin, it always interests me where they're getting that info.

Originally posted by thtadthtshldntb
The reference above refers so a FF Handbook, which presumably counts until retconed,

Actually it will never count until it's artistically depicted On Panel.

Originally posted by thtadthtshldntb
and an X-Men series.

Never happened.

Imperiex THOUGHT he was a force of nature, if he really was a natural being in balance with the universe (in the wat Galactus is) I dont see why Kismet would intervene to stop him. Unless of course, Kismet is not in balance with the DCU, but I dont think there is on panel proof for that.