Originally posted by General Kenobl
What's exactly the level of difference in a "<" for you? Does it better, just a tinsy bit better, or what? Anakin shouldn't be underminded as a Force user, I mean his anger alone collapsed a room, didn't it?
Anakin's raw power gives him moments of unparalleled Force power. He has no mastery or experience with the Force. It is in Force-based places that he tends to fall up short. In Labyrinth of Evil, he didn't have the power to open one of the doors in Gunray's citadel with the Force, and he finally had Clone troopers blow it up.
People like Mace and Dooku - and, God help him, Yoda and Sidious - are far more skilled with the Force, though every single one of them lack his raw power and raw command of it.
Originally posted by Generic Hero
People love Revan because you are Revan. I am Revan. Escape is Revan. General Kenobi is Revan. Our actions defined him, and because of that, we feel more closely attached to him than any other character.
Which is what makes Revan-love nothing more than a nauseating exercise in narcissism.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Which is what makes Revan-love nothing more than a nauseating exercise in narcissism.
Lmao. You have a point.
Though, even with Generic's rebuttle, I still don't see why this justifies the intense amount of pro-Revan bias that we have. I could understand that, if he were a concrete and known character whom we have knowledge of - as far as power, traits, techniques, beliefs and so forth - indeed, the very details that a character should possess.
But we don't. Which is why it is so damn frustrating.