Originally posted by FeceManNo you didn't. It's just your view on how the scriptures should be taken.....you have no comment on the list of men who were considered heretic when the one you follow was a murderer and a Sun God worshipper? He had a coin minted after himself say something like "Sol Vincus"..or something....It has the Sun Gods pictures for gods sake..... 🙄
Uh...I pwned your thread.
Originally posted by debbiejo
No you didn't. It's just your view on how the scriptures should be taken.....you have no comment on the list of men who were considered heretic when the one you follow was a murderer and a Sun God worshipper? He had a coin minted after himself say something like "Sol Vincus"..or something....It has the Sun Gods pictures for gods sake..... 🙄
Just, no.
Absolutely not.
The people who wrote that blasphemous trash deliberately misinterpreted Scripture by twisting it and, often times, blatantly omitting chunks of it.
They have departed from the path of win.
Welcome to fail.
Originally posted by finti
once again you arrogantly think your interpretation and understanding of these scriptures are more rightful than others.
Originally posted by FeceMan
The people who wrote that blasphemous trash deliberately misinterpreted Scripture by twisting it and, often times, blatantly omitting chunks of it.
Here is the pirmary reason why you fail.
Interpretation is interpretation. If its not YOUR interpretation, its still an interpretation. Unless you can provide some good reason why that interpretation is false, it should be respected.
The Bible is NOT coherent, it was written by different people with differing opinon. If you want to object, use souces form the smae book at minimum.
You often run to the other end of the book and bring in a dolphin to superficially show a dog is not a mammal.
Originally posted by Alliance
Here is the pirmary reason why you fail.
Interpretation is interpretation. If its not YOUR interpretation, its still an interpretation. Unless you can provide some good reason why that interpretation is false, it should be respected.
The Bible is NOT coherent,
it was written by different people with differing opinon. If you want to object, use souces form the smae book at minimum.
You often run to the other end of the book and bring in a dolphin to superficially show a dog is not a mammal.
I can say that "resurrection" is talked about a lot in Scripture because that's what is offered. Jesus died for our sins, blahblahblah, you get eternal life. I can see how the idea of resurrection can be confused with reincarnation since they are so similar but if you read the Bible in it entirety instead of grabbing the interpretations of bits and pieces, you will figure this out for yourself.
Furthermore, just because there isn't a doctrine against reincarnation doesn't mean the Church condoned the idea of reincarnation. A doctrine against it was only written after it became an issue. I doubt there was a law against abortion until the first abortion was performed.