Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Ah. That's what I thought. OK strap yourself in.Here is what you asked. Ready?
'are you trying to tell me that in the whole world there is no one who talks shit on the net but would be unable to back it up in real life?'
Here is what I replied, as you so thoughtfully quoted:
'Nope.'
Shall we go over that, for the slow one[s]?
Am I trying to tell you that blah blah....? 'Nope'
Did you see?
Again: you asked whether I was trying to tell you that 'in the whole world there is no one who talks shit on the net but would be unable to back it up in real life?'
Remember what I said? 'Nope'- that means, in case you haven't grasped it yet, and I strongly feel you probably haven't, that I am not trying to tell you that.
Now what?
You don't care?
I should lighten up?
More misunderstandings?
A combination? Don't keep us waiting, the suspense is too much.
by posting nope, most people would take it as you disagreeing with me, saying that you believe that all people can back themselves up in person. its pretty convenient that now you claim that you were in fact saying that you do not believe this to be the case, that there are in fact some out there who do this.
seems to me that you are one of the people that we are talking about.
you also questioned me earlier when i brought up people being banned and returning as socks, and members posting fake pics here. you asked what those had to do with my claims about people misrepresenting themselves, lying, and not being able to back up their claims. it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure it out, they are lying and misrepresenting themselves....do i need to slow down for you? the subjects are LINKED, and they points are completely valid.
why you cant see this is beyond me. were you dropped on your head as a baby? did mommy fail to breast feed you as a child? a little too much chlorine in the gene pool? is your uncle really your daddy?