What a very strange statement.
To say that from a hardware perspective the PS3 is "by far the more interesting console."
...
I am very, very confused indeed by that, and that gives me seriopus pause for throught over the judgment and intelligence of those who formulated it. Professionals too. VERY worrying.
The PS3 is by far the more POWERFUL console. It is by far the more sophisitcated technological achievement. But interesting? The ENTIRE problem here is that the PS3 is totally unimaginative- simply more power bolted on, at a massive price.
I actually cannot see any argument that could possibly challenge the idea that in hardware concept, the Wii is the more interesting console. It's certainly been interesting enough to get me to buy a console for the first time... well, effectively the first time ever.
The PS3 is positively boring., heck, even if it turns out to be the greatest console ever... it's still a very boring piece of tech. PS2 with... more. I cannot see a single interesting thing about it- and I believe the interest shown by the press, including ign, vindicates that in every possible way.
I'd even call the fact that the Wii cannot play DVD s as something that actively makes it more interesting as a design decision.
Very, very weird. I really hope they just chose the wrong word. If that indicates their genuine sentiment then no reasonable person should have any confidence in their abilities to make intelligent critique.