Alex Jones, WRONG!

Started by KharmaDog4 pages
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Thats all a facade.they have long time connections to each other through the CIA.

Evidence please.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Clintons connections with the CIA go way back to his college years.

Evidence please.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Clinton also has a storied past of ties to mafia criminals who he allowed in the white house and a tour of it.

Evidence please.

It was his return favor to them for them helping him raise campaine funds for his campaine.[/B][/QUOTE]

Evidence please.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
I have seen for myself where he is at the funeral of Ron Browns and he is laughing hysterically on the video while leaving the church,then he spots a camera focused on him and he pretends to start crying,such a hypocrite.

Evidence please.

why dont you ask the government for evidence of bin laden being responsible for 9.11. you never seem to do that

exactly and I sure as hell am not going to waste my breath on him because he ignores facts and if I give him the books that prove it all he wont read it anyways.great point,yeah its funny that he thinks theres any evidence that bin laden was behind 9-11. 😆anybody who believes that fairy tale that bin laden was behind it sure isnt worth my time showing my sources for bush and clinton being long time buddies,he'll just ignore the facts on that just like he does on 9-11 anyways.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
exactly and I sure as hell am not going to waste my breath on him because he ignores facts and if I give him the books that prove it all he wont read it anyways.
And if you want proof God exists, read the Bible.

bible has no facts in though. thats the difference

Yeah great point.you sure took him to school on that one. 😄

Originally posted by Deano
bible has no facts in though. thats the difference

Although I am not big on the book, there are many historical facts, historical event and actual people in it's pages. To deny that is both ignorant and stupid as is the above comment.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Yeah great point.you sure took him to school on that one. 😄

Actually, it is not a good point at all, and he did not take him to school. You are either easily impressed or to busy hugging Deano's nuts to think clearly.

In fact, most of your posts have all the substance and resonance of a fart in a tornado.

Originally posted by Deano
bible has no facts in though. thats the difference
Difference? I've never heard of a conspiracy book being even remotely accurate.

your trying to be funny right? 😆 Just read -Crossfire.The Plot to kill kennedy by Jim Marrs.Theres an amazing amount of accurate details in a tremoundous amount of information in there in that book that prove beyond a doubt that there was a conspiracy to kill kennedy carried out by the highest levels of people in high positions of power within the government. 🙄

And in the bible there was a jesus christ who was crucified by the romans, so what's your point?

Originally posted by Mr Parker
your trying to be funny right? 😆 Just read -Crossfire.The Plot to kill kennedy by Jim Marrs.Theres an amazing amount of accurate details in a tremoundous amount of information in there in that book that prove beyond a doubt that there was a conspiracy to kill kennedy carried out by the highest levels of people in high positions of power within the government. 🙄
I prefer films to be honest.

Originally posted by lord xyz
I prefer films to be honest.

WTF? were talking about a BOOK not a film. 🙄

Originally posted by Mr Parker
WTF? were talking about a BOOK not a film. 🙄

and that book I mentioned IS honest.its loaded with plenty of facts in it.I can refer you to many more conspiracy books out there loaded with facts, thats just one of them.you made that hysterical comment that you have never heard of a conspiracy book that was remotely accurate when there are PLENTY of them out there. 😆 🤣 😆 😆 Like that one I just mentioned as just an example.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
and that book I mentioned IS honest.its loaded with plenty of facts in it.I can refer you to many more conspiracy books out there loaded with facts, thats just one of them.you made that hysterical comment that you have never heard of a conspiracy book that was remotely accurate when there are PLENTY of them out there. 😆 🤣 😆 😆 Like that one I just mentioned as just an example.

I suggest yo you two items.

1/ do not throw the word "act" around until you grasp it's concept.

2/ Smilies and happy faces do not add humor to you post, nor do they convey actual emotion. Truth be told, if you actually find what you said, the situation or yourself that humorous, then you lack humor.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
and that book I mentioned IS honest.its loaded with plenty of facts in it.I can refer you to many more conspiracy books out there loaded with facts, thats just one of them.you made that hysterical comment that you have never heard of a conspiracy book that was remotely accurate when there are PLENTY of them out there. 😆 🤣 😆 😆 Like that one I just mentioned as just an example.
What I said was I don't want to wastemoney on a book when I can see the film. And yes, I'll admit they have facts in, like George Bush is an idiot, or JFK was shot, but no conspiracy book is more than 60% truth. It's oppinions, assumptions, lies and propoganda. So no, I won't read them.

up until the point where you said lies and propaganda you had some credibility there but you lost it there.if your so sure that they have lies and propoganda in them then read that book and SHOW me the lies and propoganda in that book to prove what your talking about otherwise thats all just your opinion and heresay.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
up until the point where you said lies and propaganda you had some credibility there but you lost it there.if your so sure that they have lies and propoganda in them then read that book and SHOW me the lies and propoganda in that book to prove what your talking about otherwise thats all just your opinion and heresay.

All you post is opinons and heresay with the occasional misrepresented fact, completely untrue comment or iditioc line of thought thrown in.

give it dog,I dont read your your posts anymore these days,not about to bother with someone who is afraid of the truth about these kinds of tragedys and lives in denial about it.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
give it dog,I dont read your your posts anymore these days,not about to bother with someone who is afraid of the truth about these kinds of tragedys and lives in denial about it.

What the hell does,"give it dog" mean?

And you read my posts, denying so embarrasses yourself.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
up until the point where you said lies and propaganda you had some credibility there but you lost it there.if your so sure that they have lies and propoganda in them then read that book and SHOW me the lies and propoganda in that book to prove what your talking about otherwise thats all just your opinion and heresay.
Once again, I'd prefer to do films.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
give it dog,I dont read your your posts anymore these days,not about to bother with someone who is afraid of the truth about these kinds of tragedys and lives in denial about it.
There you conspiracy theorists go again, saying those who opose you are afraid of the truth. It's not those that are anti-conspiracy that chuck bullshit around, make stuff up and then deny when they've been proven wrong.