Originally posted by §P0oONY
Well, they were a sort of merge of LA Guns and Hollywood Rose.
Originally posted by lorddreamer
Just wondering, whats so great about Superbands? I mean, I dont listen to as much rock as I think I should, but from what Ive heard, between a supergroup and a regular plain old fashioned good group, they can be equal.
My question is: Do superbands really tend to be reflective of their superosity?
I really like Journey as well and they probably the most successful superband.
I think Audioslave is the best act in rock music right now and they are a superband, but my liking them is probably more a reflection of my liking older rock better because Audioslave is not as good as either Soundgarden or Rage Against the Machine.
Velvet Revolver is another current superband and I think they are one of the better acts around right now.
To add to this discussion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supergroup_%28music%29
Originally posted by Nellinator
I'll take your word for it. However, I think to be a superband you need to be the combination of already well accomplished musicians. I don't know, but were either of those bands famous before their malgamation?
Yeah, you're probably right... LA Guns were sort of accomplised... I don't think you would really class Guns N' Roses are one.