Originally posted by Thundar
The hypothesis taken by the strict theistic scientist is "I know God did it, but now I want to know how he did it"...while the strict atheist scientist's position is "God didn't do it, but I know nature can tell me who/what did."
No, extreme thesists don't want to know whats not in the bible. Thats why extreme right-wing christians deny evolution.
Besides both arguments are identical you're ignoring the extremes that theim can go to (just look at some of marchello's posts).
Originally posted by Thundar
So technically speaking the theist is correct, which is why history has generally demonstrated theists to be the more revolutionary scientists. If one wants to get a complete and correct answer to a problem, then logically..they first need to start with a correct premise.
Technically the theist is correct. But in the real world he's wrong.