Science told: hands off gay sheep!

A sad day there is when people think that can cure people of who they are.

What's next? A cure for people who enjoy caviar? A cure for people who like a TV show? A cure for people with freckles?

A sad day indeed ❌

Originally posted by Strangelove
A sad day there is when people think that can cure people of who they are.

What's next? A cure for people who enjoy caviar? A cure for people who like a TV show? A cure for people with freckles?

A sad day indeed ❌

Well one could say a disease they are born with (cycstic fibrosis) is who they are yet we look for cures.

It's all a matter of perspective really.

I think research should not be limited. That is might be bad for "gay equal rights" movements is possible. But I don't think the possibility to research should be limited. And if such a change programme would exist I think it should not be banned. I don't think there is a justification for that.

Originally posted by Soleran
Well one could say a disease they are born with (cycstic fibrosis) is who they are yet we look for cures.

It's all a matter of perspective really.

Obviously not part of who a person is

Originally posted by Strangelove
no, it's not about perspective. Cystic fibrosis is a malignant disease that destroys the body from the inside and causes early death.

Obviously not part of who a person is

Uh huh, it's all about perspective.

What about those folks that think being gay is a disease huh? Yeah hope you're hungry because I just brought you some food for thought.

Originally posted by Sanctuary
Talked to a gay guy who did find it offensive.

And some religious people usually take something as attack.

Well, it is offensive. Science thinks that human beings that are gay are as easily manipulated as a sheep, on top of the fact that they need to be cured at all

As for the overly religious, I can't see them having ANY issue with this. In fact, I see most of them praising the procedure. If they found out their kid was going to be gay they'd eat their own clenched fist to "fix" it.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Well, it is offensive. Science thinks that human beings that are gay are as easily manipulated as a sheep, on top of the fact that they need to be cured at all

As for the overly religious, I can't see them having ANY issue with this. In fact, I see most of them praising the procedure. If they found out their kid was going to be gay they'd eat their own clenched fist to "fix" it.

I am not sure whether science thinks that. The authors of that text might. And people that read it.

But it does spoil their gay people chose to be gay theories. Oh, right, doublethink.

Originally posted by Soleran
Uh huh, it's all about perspective.

What about those folks that think being gay is a disease huh? Yeah hope you're hungry because I just brought you some food for thought.

And who looks at a debilitating disease like cystic fibrosis, and thinks 'Well that's just swell!'

Originally posted by Strangelove
folks who think homosexuality is a disease are obviously batshit crazy. It doesn't have any adverse affects on the body.

And who looks at a debilitating disease like cystic fibrosis, and thinks 'Well that's just swell!'

It's just the beginning lets not even begin to think otherwise.

Go go scientific research!

Originally posted by Sanctuary
I think research should not be limited. That is might be bad for "gay equal rights" movements is possible. But I don't think the possibility to research should be limited. And if such a change programme would exist I think it should not be banned. I don't think there is a justification for that.

the problem is that its harmless to simply be a homosexual and many millions of people, of sound mind and aware consention, enjoy being what they were born to be and are proud of who they are, and most importantly: dont want to be "cured".

the next step in this logical slippery slope would be to make other superficial changes. altering one's being at birth for nothing more than for the convenience/vanity/selfishness of the parents is a clear abomination.

this is human engineering. i can only think of a couple of greater threats to mankind than that. i think they are correct and that the only logical course of action would be to drop it like a hot brick and run.

doesnt all this information kill the idea that homosexuallity is necessarily chosen/taught? makes me wish they would unban whob so i could laugh in his face.

You don't want to laugh in his face, you want to do something much more grotesque in his face....and I want to watch.

Originally posted by PVS
the problem is that its harmless to simply be a homosexual and many millions of people, of sound mind and aware consention, enjoy being what they were born to be and are proud of who they are, and most importantly: dont want to be "cured".

the next step in this logical slippery slope would be to make other superficial changes. altering one's being at birth for nothing more than for the convenience/vanity/selfishness of the parents is a clear abomination.

this is human engineering. i can only think of a couple of greater threats to mankind than that. i think they are correct and that the only logical course of action would be to drop it like a hot brick and run.

doesnt all this information kill the idea that homosexuallity is necessarily chosen/taught? makes me wish they would unban whob so i could laugh in his face.

I don't follow you quite.

Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?

Originally posted by Sanctuary
I don't follow you quite.

Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?

He just subliminally told you to go watch:

GATTACA

Originally posted by Soleran
He just subliminally told you to go watch:

[b]GATTACA [/B]

I watched Gattaca.

I can not base my opinion on a(n excellent) movie.

Humans are still free. If one argues that abortions are okay, genetic manipulation should be as well.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic

I seriously doubt that.

Doubt the union or doubt seeing it as an attack?

This is not a cure unless they can come off the patch and still be heterosexual. Otherwise it just creates another drug user. Ultimately this could never be used unless the person wanted to change.

Originally posted by Robtard
Doubt the union or doubt seeing it as an attack?

The union.

Originally posted by Nellinator
This is not a cure unless they can come off the patch and still be heterosexual. Otherwise it just creates another drug user. Ultimately this could never be used unless the person wanted to change.

You had me right up until the end.

Originally posted by Sanctuary
I don't follow you quite.

Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?

not sure

if you feel that alterations in sheep should be allowed, i strongly disagree

i think research is fine, as long as human research is also applied.
once the data is collected, it should be documented. so long as there is
proof that at least some gay people are genetically predisposed to prefer the same sex i think it should be researched. not to 'cure' anything but to better understand ourselves as a species.

...plus if that can be proven then it blows the doors off the 'god warrior' argument that its chosen and thus a sin.

If a person wants to change, I think it is a viable option for them. If it is having an adverse affect on the person, if it is holding them back from a desire for their own family, etc. I have nothing against it.