Lets just be honest....

woah, dude, i treat that like an insult to my mother when it is used on me!

Mr. Spock's got nothing on me.

well... i love star wars, the thought of a greater technology and knowledge and sciences has always intrigued me, and i think it is a way to get imagination, which is what all inventions come from... but i really dont blurt out that i play KOTOR all the time... i mean, i am quarterback for a senior football team and i am one of the most popular preps of our school, so i really dont think that liking Star Wars makes you, or is restriced to geeks, do you agree??

Just my point. Normal people are boring. I don't associate with anybody who is "normal" in the general sense. Everyone I know is weird to some extent.

Same here. Though really there is no such thing as "normal", everyone is wierd in there own way.

Originally posted by Faunus
lmfao Loving the logic.

I can sense that the drift of sarcasm didn't reach your shores (I don't blame you, looking over it). If what I said were true, then being an ass or psychopathic maniac wouldn't matter if you looked good or not.

Well you could say there are normal people in terms of age/generation. For instance, I could definitely give you an idea of what a normal college guy/girl are, and what they do. The word normal can be used in some aspects.

god and im omly 13........ i dislike normal people and the ''normalities'', werid people can be smart to. (me)

Originally posted by Advent
I can sense that the drift of sarcasm didn't reach your shores (I don't blame you, looking over it). If what I said were true, then being an ass or psychopathic maniac wouldn't matter if you looked good or not.

If you were a psychopath wouldn't that make you a maniac in a sense? Just throwing that out there for you.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
If you were a psychopath wouldn't that make you a maniac in a sense? Just throwing that out there for you.

1. No, it doesn't necessarily have to be in the way I would define my usage. For example, there have been undoubted cases where a person has been diagnosed with psychopathy, but not necessarily mania (my usage).

Like, you could just go up and stab someone, and be a psychopath, but that doesn't mean you have mania. As in jumping around, "BLAAHHH!", etc. Obviously a psychopath is a synonym for a maniac, but it's not limited to one definition. In terms of medical (mental) conditions or whatever the hell you would categorize them under, they aren't the same.

For reference, a "maniac" could be someone with mania.

2. There was no reason for you to be "throwing" anything "out there" if all you were going to do was attempt to call me out on semantics.

I wasn't calling you out lol, I was simply making a statement. That's why I asked what you meant because from what I understood, a psychopath would(or I suppose now could) make you a maniac. But no matter, thanks for the lengthy explanation.