Mum sues over ruined nude pics

A German woman is suing a foster agency, after her teenage foster son ruined valuable naked photos of her - by comitting an act of self-love all over them. Marietta Anton, 50, who now lives in Portugal's Algarve, was 25 when she was photographed naked by her boyfriend at the time, Sigmar Polke. After they split Polke went on to become a world famous artist, and the old pictures were valued at over £35,000.

But when Anton's 15-year-old foster son Mehmet found the old snaps, he thought he had unearthed a secret porn stack, and proceeded to do what teenage boys will do.

In news that seem likely to keep local psychiatrists busy for a while, he did not realise who the model was whilst enjoying himself with the pictures.

Despite work by art experts to restore the pictures, they were extensively damaged, and only made £8,000 at auction.

Anton is now suing the German child services organisation that placed Mehmet with her two years ago for the remaining value of the pictures. A court in Bonn will rule on the case on December 29.

😆 😘 😆

Source

How would you like to be the judge for that case? 😬

I know.....but keep in mind that most Judges are only that cause they could never cut in in their own practice.........and most of them don't even know the law......

sorry a bit off topic.

Alright, Debs, no need to bring your trial into this discussion. I think it's fairly obvious that this German photograph scandal is of more importance than that trial of yours that could decide your well-being and welfare for the rest of your life.

I think the kid finding out what he'd been whacking off to is enough punishment.

Originally posted by botankus
Alright, Debs, no need to bring your trial into this discussion. I think it's fairly obvious that this German photograph scandal is of more importance than that trial of yours that could decide your well-being and welfare for the rest of your life.

Hit you on the head. 😛

Originally posted by botankus
Alright, Debs, no need to bring your trial into this discussion. I think it's fairly obvious that this German photograph scandal is of more importance than that trial of yours that could decide your well-being and welfare for the rest of your life.

Originally posted by Soleran
😱 😛

I know judges and attorneys.........and it's all a game.........

Advise for anyone willing to listen..........do your own homework and you cave millions like Geoko (sp?)..............no need.......system is crap.

Originally posted by botankus
How would you like to be the judge for that case? 😬

"Judgment for the defendant on the basis that the plaintiff is a ****ing moron. Now get the hell out of my courtroom and send your son to a shrink. Except I forgot that you're his foster mother, not his real mom, so it's okay. I mean, it's still gross, wanking to your mother figure, but it's not so bad."

Also, that kid should learn a little self-control. For shame, ruining them for later like that.

Man I Would recognise my MOTHER when she was 25.,

Originally posted by Funkadelic
Man I Would recognise my MOTHER when she was 25.,

foster mother.

Originally posted by PVS
foster mother.

Originally posted by debbiejo
do your own homework and you cave millions like Geoko (sp?)..............no need.......system is crap.

They only save you 15 minutes. They quoted me higher than my company. So I agree, their system is crap.

p.s. I believe it's Geico. Geoko wounds like someone from Star Wars.

It is Geico.

Geiko are geisha(s).

How could they be 'damaged extensively'? did this kid just go to town on these pictures?

Originally posted by FeceMan
It is Geico.

Geiko are geisha(s).

Probably while you were writing your post, I edited it when I looked it up and saw it was a geisha. I don't think they perform the same services as Geico.

Yet another glimpse of the Divine sense of humor.

Either this is done before, or I read this thread without looking at the title.

May i ask why people are not judging this thread? Another, similar thread to this was judged because a member decided to open a new thread, on a discussion of a particular thing😖

Originally posted by soin2cal
May i ask why people are not judging this thread? Another, similar thread to this was judged because a member decided to open a new thread, on a discussion of a particular thing😖

...what?