Originally posted by Fishy
I don't think you understand relationships...The compromise would be you saying "Okay Honey, I won't get drunk and watch football and as punishment for me suggesting it I'm taking you shopping next week...."
You're both wrong. The solution is marrying a girl who loves to get super-drunk and watch football. (I got the football part down...still working on raising her level past moderately-drunk...)
Originally posted by Fishy
I don't think you understand relationships...The compromise would be you saying "Okay Honey, I won't get drunk and watch football and as punishment for me suggesting it I'm taking you shopping next week...."
😱 😂
That's not what I said, did I?
If so, it came out the wrong way.
Originally posted by botankus
You're both wrong. The solution is marrying a girl who loves to get super-drunk and watch football. (I got the football part down...still working on raising her level past moderately-drunk...)
Ah, now you're talking. See....I circumvented the process.
....married a girl who loves sports, plays ice hockey, and loves to drink. 🙂
Originally posted by Storm
Each partner should focus on giving 100% to the other person. That way, everyone is both giving and receiving 100% of what they need and desire.
I don't subscribe to this theory, although that is how it SHOULD be.
2 total individuals (maybe with some common interests, tastes, personality, etc) come together to become one.
It is each'es individuality that attracted them to the other person in the first place. In this day and age, you must retain this (independent) part of you. A) For the initial attraction reason I have previously stated, and B) if it doesn't work out and/or the other person is all about the receiving and no givin', you'll be a vegetable when the relationship ends.
You must always guard/protect this part of you. Call it want you want-your soul, your being, whatever. But no one is ever entitled to all of it, all the time.