Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Because the question was a no-brainer.
You'd be surprised...there are some people who'd be willing to risk sending an innocent person to the death penalty, in effort to prevent a crime.
I will not mention who I am talking about, but myself and a few other people had a debate with a certain someone who argued his extreme hate for peadophiles, and how he'd be willing to kill a man who might be innocent in effort to prevent children from being molested in the future.
Originally posted by Robtard
Not necessarily always the case... What if a person is being wrongfully punished by an imagined or false crime?
An imagined or false crime has an imagined or false criminal.
Therefore, if an innocent person is being punished for an imaginary crime, then by extension, an imaginary guilty person is not being punished.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
An imagined or false crime has an imagined or false criminal.Therefore, if an innocent person is being punished for an imaginary crime, then by extension, an imaginary guilty person is not being punished.
Thats very . . . Alice in Wonerland
What happens if an imaginary innocent person is puinshed by an imaginary court to an imaginary death penalty?
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Thats very . . . Alice in WonerlandWhat happens if an imaginary innocent person is puinshed by an imaginary court to an imaginary death penalty?
😆
I'd rather an imaginary innocent person not have an imaginary punishment than for an imaginary criminal to get away with imaginary freedom