Republican Nomination?

Started by Devil King60 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
Mormons never throw in the towel, they just take breaks.

Well, they did decide to move to the middle of the desert and call it the promised land, ignoring the fact that it was because they were chased out of every other place they wanted to live.

Originally posted by inimalist
Cheney....

Cheney will be too busy rolling his fat-ass around the spoils of war.

I was watching the coverage of the Tornadoes on Tsunami-Tuesday, and some dumb hick said he couldn't believe that his town looked like pictures he'd seen of Iraq. Doesn't that make us the Tornado in that case?

Huckabee is probably going to be his VP, at least that's what people have been saying.
I hope the debates come down to Ron Paul vs McCain, at least then Ron will have more time to speak and he can make McCain look like the fool he is.

Originally posted by Admiral Akbar
Huckabee is probably going to be his VP, at least that's what people have been saying.
I hope the debates come down to Ron Paul vs McCain, at least then Ron will have more time to speak and he can make McCain look like the fool he is.

True, McCain was doing horrible at the beginning and now hes on top 😱 , hes not even a Republican much less a conservative. How hes gotten where he is is beyond me!

Originally posted by inimalist
shape shifting trans-dimensional reptilian infanticidal Illuminati

duh

please dont confuse me with Deano.No my answer is the truth.The they are The Rockefellers and Rothchilds along with other very prominebt people such as Henry Kissinger.They are the real controllers of thw world who use their puppets such as the clintons and bush to make decisons that effect the world.these are they.its common knowledge that its because of the rockefellers mainly that the world is so screwed up and why we have wars.

also the rockefellers and rothchilds belong to a couple of groups called the COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS-CFR and the Bilderbergers.Every candidate we have had since the last 60 years or so was a member of this group.you cant become president without being one which is why I dont see Paul getting elected.Not as long as we have the electoral vote anyways.If your a member of the CFR or bilderbergers,it doesnt matter who the candidate is,they are going to continue what those 2 groups want which is a war.You have heard of the CFR and bilderbergers right? if not,in a nutshell what they are basically is a group of evil people such as Kissinger,clinton,bush ect,who consider the american people the enemy if you are not extremely rich and oppose wars.Thats why I would love to see Paul get elected because we would finally since the first time since kennedy,have hope for the future of the world because again he is the only candidate still running,who is NOT member of these 2 groups.

Originally posted by BigRed
To reach the masses, you need the media.

When the media acts like you do not exist, enter bad numbers.

all im sayin is, someone had to put the signs up. for 3 percept of the pop they sure as hell covered a lotta ground.

Originally posted by red g jacks
all im sayin is, someone had to put the signs up. for 3 percept of the pop they sure as hell covered a lotta ground.

Well, depending on the area, a couple thousand people can cover a lot of ground. Especially dedicated ones.

I think there was a silent compaign against him because of a you_tube video titled "Mitt Romney - Who Let the Dogs Out?"

I think the ones against Romney really want to hurt this country, because he was the better bet, most people know that.

McCain/Obama are followers moreso then Romney.

Over the past few days, McCain has won in Washington state, the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia.

Huckabee won in Kansas, and won the popular vote in Louisiana, but since no candidate won a majority, the 20 statewide delegates will be going to the National Convention officially "uncommitted"

Huckabee is delusional if he thinks he could ever beat Hillary or Obama.

Originally posted by Quark_666
Huckabee is delusional if he thinks he could ever beat Hillary or Obama.

Against Hillary, he'd have a good chance. Against Obama, his chances slim down quite a bit.

Why would he have a good chance against Hillary?

Originally posted by Admiral Akbar
Why would he have a good chance against Hillary?
More than half of America hates her. She's portrayed as the anti-christ and a liberal which apparently is a bad thing in America, the place of liberty.

Originally posted by lord xyz
More than half of America hates her. She's portrayed as the anti-christ

Anti-Christ? No. I don't think so. Not by any significant part of the media. Just a politician who has made far too many enemies

Originally posted by lord xyz
and a liberal which apparently is a bad thing in America, the place of liberty.

Liberalism has nothing to do with freedom vs. slavery, just like republicans and democrats really have nothing to do with a republic vs. a democracy, and the green party isn't promoting St. Patrick's day.

America isn't based off of liberty anyway. It is based off of equal participation in government.

I've heard of some Repub/Conservs voting for Hillary, the reason, to take away/counter a vote from Obama, on the grounds that McCain can beat Hillary, but not Obama.

Originally posted by lord xyz
More than half of America hates her. She's portrayed as the anti-christ and a liberal which apparently is a bad thing in America, the place of liberty.
Well, it is a bad thing in the US.

Originally posted by Robtard
I've heard of some Repub/Conservs voting for Hillary, the reason, to take away/counter a vote from Obama, on the grounds that McCain can beat Hillary, but not Obama.
Makes sense to me. I don't think she has a good shot at becoming president.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, it is a bad thing in the US.

Hard to say in a nation split between two parties, I'd say.

So...Ralph Nader is running for president under the Green Party....again...Do you think he stands a chance this year?