Teens murder puppy

Originally posted by FeceMan
I suppose that, were these sorts of people a larger portion of the population, you might make a point.

Are the people who control the government in a populous majority? Oh, right...

Originally posted by FeceMan
Troll more, please.

Haha, if you were more sophisticated you'd be...more sophisticated.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
It then labeled the tens of thousands of corpses as 'collateral damage',

Collateral damage happens in every single war. It's unavoidable and an inevitability, ey. (or are you denying that??)

Being a cry-baby hippy on the internet isn't to change that.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Collateral damage happens in every single war. It's unavoidable and an inevitability, ey. (or are you denying that??)

Being a cry-baby hippy on the internet isn't to change that.

And?

People can point out shit that happens. If you don't want to hear the truth or don't care, fair enough, but others might.

Originally posted by Grimm22
Two teens in Atlanta murdered a 3-month year old puppy, by burning it alive in an oven. They then used the puppy's corpse as a sideshow presentation to the neighborhood children.

Here's the full story:

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/01/26/D8MT6K380.html

----------

Put these bastards in an oven and burn them alive. This is one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard 🙁

There was also an article of people that put a baby in the over or microwave here.... 🙁

Originally posted by debbiejo
🙁

There was also an article of people that put a baby in the over or microwave here.... 🙁

😘

cooked baby! (cooked they taste horrible, they're much better fried)

Originally posted by Akira99
THIS is what ought to happen to those teens:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tCV7-2_2Jo

Jesus Christ! 🙁 😘

That death was far to painless and quick for them

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
A nation bombed and murdered a sovereign country under false pretensions by using lots of expensive bombs. It then labeled the tens of thousands of corpses as 'collateral damage', raped the natural resources, gave all the 'rebuilding' contracts to their friends, and then got annoyed when the 'democratically-elected' government started making noises about not wanting the invaders in their country any longer.

Put this bastard country in an oven and burn it alive. This is one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard.

Without my "bastard" country, there would be no Internet, thus making you never be able to spread you're demented opinions 😐

Originally posted by Grimm22
Without my "bastard" country, there would be no Internet, thus making you never be able to spread you're demented opinions 😐

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's false logic though. Without my country there wouldn't be a lot of stuff. Without Ya Krunk'd Floo's country there wouldn't be your country. What's your point?

My point is that its hilarious how easy it is to attempt to bastardize the US, when without us, the world would be a hellhole right now 🙄

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Are the people who control the government in a populous majority? Oh, right...

Haha, if you were more sophisticated you'd be...more sophisticated.

Well let's duct tape their noses and upper/lower limbs and put them both in ovens, take pictures and show it off, see if they like it.

Take a nail gun, nail then to a wall, break their leg joints with a sledge hammer, then just leave them there to die. 😐

(maybe a bit too much, but after reading or seeing something like that, it's the only thing that seems suitable.)

if these were my kids, i would beat the living shit out of them

hell, bad upbringing

Originally posted by allofyousuckkk
if these were my kids, i would beat the living shit out of them

hell, bad upbringing

If these were my kids, I wouldn't be able to live with myself

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Collateral damage happens in every single war. It's unavoidable and an inevitability, ey. (or are you denying that??)

Being a cry-baby hippy on the internet isn't to change that.

When 'collateral damage' occurs on US soil it's considered grounds for re-writing international law and precipitates war. When other countries respond in this manner they're 'terrorist states'.

Furthermore, the use of the term 'collateral damage' to describe the deaths of thousands of civilians has only been used in recent years (by the Bush administration); another example of the propaganda you're buying into.

Originally posted by Grimm22
Without my "bastard" country, there would be no Internet, thus making you never be able to spread you're demented opinions 😐

Originally posted by Grimm22
My point is that its hilarious how easy it is to attempt to bastardize the US, when without us, the world would be a hellhole right now 🙄

You're not very smart, are you?

Originally posted by FeceMan
Your ability to dodge the point would have made you an excellent casting choice in The Matrix.

It's OK, you just didn't understand the implication. Cool boots.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo

You're not very smart, are you?

You're not very sane are you? 😐

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
When 'collateral damage' occurs on US soil it's considered grounds for re-writing international law and precipitates war. When other countries respond in this manner they're 'terrorist states'.

Furthermore, the use of the term 'collateral damage' to describe the deaths of thousands of civilians has only been used in recent years (by the Bush administration); another example of the propaganda you're buying into.

I'm buying into any propaganda, ese. I know the definition of collateral damage is, it's unfortunate, but an occurance in every single war. You name any war...WW2...Vietnam....Iraqi Freedom, it always happens.

You're just saying that "collateral damage" is a term misused, as a scapegoat for any anti-American sentiment you might have, and to bash Bush.

You're right in the sense that thousands of civilians die in every war. Indeed, Robert McNamara has gone on record as saying that the bombs dropped on Japan during WWII were chosen to cause the maximum amount of civilian casualties with the least amount of effort. Nice work if you can get it...

However, I'm saying that the Bush administration's use the term 'collateral damage' is their way of dehumanising the victims, when it is the perpetrators that are inhumane. This is a war about money and control, and nothing about the promotion of liberty, therefore all the deaths are unnecessary and I hope that one day Bush will be held accountable for them.

Also, I am anti-Bush, not anti-American. It's just a shame that you've been hoodwinked into believing the two are incompatible. Before you bring up my initial post, I was being satiric, somethine you and Grimm seem to have missed.

Originally posted by Grimm22
My point is that its hilarious how easy it is to attempt to bastardize the US, when without us, the world would be a hellhole right now 🙄

Right, no, not really. Just because the US had some positive effect in the past does not mean that it can't do shit now.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo

Also, I am anti-Bush, not anti-American. It's just a shame that you've been hoodwinked into believing the two are incompatible.

Wouldn't it be more like 'indistinguishable'?