Originally posted by Kazenji
I disagree with your sig quote Mr parker"organics are the biggest sin in hollywood history"
Its better to make it real or else it will look to fake
thats the most hilarious thing I have ever heard making it look real since we are talking about a comicbook movie here. 😆 yeah like a guy gaining powers to stick to walls and have superhuman strength ALL somehow from the bite of a genetically altered spider is REAL? 😆 well organics coming out of the wrists sure as hell are not real,the placement would be the webbing shooting out of his butt if you want to talk real. 🙄 again a guy swinging from buildings from a spiderbite more than anything is fake. 🙄
Originally posted by SpaceMonkey
Daredevil was EXTREMELY underrated. It was much better than Spider Man 1 & 2, and Fantastic 4 but not better than Hellboy and the X-Men films.
exactly.well said my man.I disagree though that it wasnt better than the xmen movies.havent seen the last one but the first two focused way too much on wolverines character and not enough on the others.
Originally posted by Eclipso
What is everyones problem with the first movie?
Ben Affleck turned a sequel a while back. Besides how can anyone say that Daredevil was a good film. I thought it was a piece of you know what. Second the costume he wore, that horrible degrating plot, bad box office returns that is why there is no sequel.
I heard a while back that the studio wanted to do this. It wasn't going anywhere though 'cause they wanted Affleck back. And Affleck said he wouldn't do it unless Kevin Smith wrote or directed it or something.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
thats the most hilarious thing I have ever heard making it look real since we are talking about a comicbook movie here. 😆 yeah like a guy gaining powers to stick to walls and have superhuman strength ALL somehow from the bite of a genetically altered spider is REAL? 😆 well organics coming out of the wrists sure as hell are not real,the placement would be the webbing shooting out of his butt if you want to talk real. 🙄 again a guy swinging from buildings from a spiderbite more than anything is fake. 🙄
I don't get why you're bringing down the movies because they're not realistic. Spider-Man is no way realistic.
Originally posted by Wolfie
I heard a while back that the studio wanted to do this. It wasn't going anywhere though 'cause they wanted Affleck back. And Affleck said he wouldn't do it unless Kevin Smith wrote or directed it or something.So getting the strength and ability to stick to walls from a radioactive spider is more realistic than a genetically engineered spider?
I don't get why you're bringing down the movies because they're not realistic. Spider-Man is no way realistic.
Hence why its called a comic book movie
Whats next Hellboy is real and all those events actually happen 🙄
Originally posted by WolfieSo getting the strength and ability to stick to walls from a radioactive spider is more realistic than a genetically engineered spider?
I don't get why you're bringing down the movies because they're not realistic. Spider-Man is no way realistic. [/B]
When did I ever say that getting the strength and ability to stick to walls from a radioactive spider is more realistic than a genetically altered spider? the fact is they are BOTH just as unrealistic as the other.Obviously you only read parts of that post and not the WHOLE post.I was pointing out how lame and laughable his argument is that organics should have been in the movie when he made that ludicrous comment "make it real" because THE WHOLE THING OF SPIDER-MAN IS UNREAL.That was my point I was making is if you want "realism in a movie"- which apparently he does,,you shouldn't be seeing a comic book movie in the first place. 😆 My other point I made that you also obviously did not read was you want talk about making it real-which AGAIN is what HE said,not me,then organics should not be in the movie because realistically and logically,they would shoot out of his ass. 🙄