Distort the username above you

Originally posted by ThePittman
This is an example of showing the process of changing one letter to another and if this process was being displayed then yes you did distort the letter however you one "replaced" the letter with another which doesn't fall under your definition of distortion. In your image example you used a method of manipulation to achieve your final result but hitting the key to replace one letter with another is not.

I replaced it? No, I merely distorted it to look like another letter while leaving the majority of the username active in the distortion.

For the last time: Hitting the key is irrelevant; It's just easier.

A > H. Distortion complete.

Simple, really.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
See? Your logic is far beyond shattered, friend.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Self proclaimed pwnage = Arrogance, something you've claimed you have not liked about me in various threads. Hypocrite.

You haven't proved anything, and you are using logical fallacies to back up an incorrect claim.

Originally posted by ThePittman
So by your definition

Ztrangelove = Distortion
Ztrangelove = Renaming

so
Distortion = renaming

Way to go there, and you keep missing the point. I never said that Distortion is the same as Change but that Distortion is a type of change there for it fall under Change, plain and simple "my friend" "son" or what ever you want to call yourself. You reason and logic is laughable and as you like to say Strawman logic.

Renaming = Change? How? It effectively means you MUST completely change something to rename something? Oh yeah, it doesn't!

Just like if you added or modified a username with funky little characters and maintained the letters in a username, it's a distortion but you have renamed yourself. Your factor does not apply, once again.

This is too easy.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
This is too easy.

You make me laugh. 😂

Originally posted by Strangelove
To quote you: Hypocrite

You haven't proved anything, and you are using logical fallacies to back up an incorrect claim.

I pointed out a fact. How is that boosting myself arrogantly?

What the hell is up with you?

Originally posted by Strangelove
Too easy to what? Completely make up shit?

You make me laugh. 😂

You don't back up anything you say. It's amusing, but saddening.

Quick question.

Why do any of you care?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Quick question.

Why do any of you care?

Principal.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You don't back up anything you say. It's amusing, but saddening.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I pointed out a fact. How is that boosting myself arrogantly?

What the hell is up with you?

Originally posted by Strangelove
I'm done entertaining your lunacy, I'm just going to sit back and laugh now

You've lost, good sir.

So because you say that it's a fact that my logic is 'shattered', you're automatically correct? Hypocrite 🙄

Hahahaha! Foolishness! Where did I say it was a fact? I pointed out that your logic was flawed because it was. I proved that it was. You had nothing to say for it.

Get over yourself, man. Everytime I absolutely ruin you in a debate, you find some way to crawl your way out of it by slowly cutting down your posts and ignoring most of what I have to say.

It's a damn shame.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You've lost, good sir.

Hahahaha! Foolishness! Where did I say it was a fact?

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I pointed out a fact. How is that boosting myself arrogantly?

What the hell is up with you?

Get over yourself, man. Everytime I absolutely ruin you in a debate, you find some way to crawl your way out of it by slowly cutting down your posts and ignoring most of what I have to say.

It's a damn shame.

So because you say I've lost, it's true? Hypocrite

You won't refute my posts, you're effectively backing out of the debate and you've ignored most of my points.

What, where did I say you losing was truth? I mean, it sure looks that way but it does not make it 100% true.

Not 4 posts earlier. Are you that much of a moron?

I'm sorry, I never boosted myself and I never pulled off anything arrogant. You did by self proclaiming that you had pwned me. Try again.

So because you say that you ruined me, it's true? Hypocrite. You have no proof to back up your claims, and your attempts to wear me down and declare 'victory' are not working. Keep trying though

I've presented proof. Don't be ignorant on top of arrogant, Strangelove. You're effectively backing out of the debate, as I explained above. You directly committed a fallacy and you ignored some of my rebuttals.

You're even changing the subject as we speak. Come on, man. Just face it.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
What, where did I say you losing was truth? I mean, it sure looks that way but it does not make it 100% true.

I've presented proof. Don't be ignorant on top of arrogant, Strangelove. You're effectively backing out of the debate, as I explained above. You directly committed a fallacy and you ignored some of my rebuttals.

I am indeed backing out of the debate. Because I know that you are saying nothing of substance and you are, in effect, full of hot air. I have nothing more to say to you, so now I'm just having fun. Are you? 🙂

So me and example of renaming, distorting, replacing and changing a username, by your logic the below 4 meat the criteria.

1. Ztrangelove
2. Ztrangelove
3. Ztrangelove
4. Ztrangelove

Just face it you don't know what the hell you are talking about, you are trying to be literal and philosophical at the same time and failing miserably. I rarely ever say this to anyone but you "good sir" are plain and simple WRONG.

Well, by saying I've lost, aren't you saying that it's true? Or are you saying I've lost when I've won? Your lack of logic astounds me.

I asked you tell me where I said that it was true, Strangelove. I merely said you were losing.

I ignored your pseudo-rebuttals because they would never stand up to logic. Congrats.

Pseudo rebuttals? Hah, if they were so fake, they'd be easily rebutted by someone as intelligent as yourself, right? You're making more statements that cannot hold water and you're making more excuses to escape your own damn loss. A pity.

I am indeed backing out of the debate. Because I know that you are saying nothing of substance and you are, in effect, full of hot air. I have nothing more to say to you, so now I'm just having fun. Are you? smile

How utterly predictable. How did I know Strangelove would walk away from another debate? You can't even man up. It's bad.

You've walked away. This has made many things clear.

Originally posted by ThePittman
So me and example of renaming, distorting, replacing and changing a username, by your logic the below 4 meat the criteria.

1. Ztrangelove
2. Ztrangelove
3. Ztrangelove
4. Ztrangelove

Just face it you don't know what the hell you are talking about, you are trying to be literal and philosophical at the same time and failing miserably. I rarely ever say this to anyone but you "good sir" are plain and simple WRONG.

LOL.

Nice irrelevant semantics. That is, in effect, a distortion. One could say I have twisted the word. It doesn't matter if I punched a key or not. You make no logical sense whatsoever. Fine then.

You used a mouse to distort my name. That means it's not a distortion.

^ That's how ridiculous you sound. You think because you state I'm wrong it makes it so?

Reality check, friend. Come back when you know your head from a hole in the ground.

1. Ztrangelove.

^ A distortion. Plain and simple. A majority of the username remains and the character has been effectively altered, which is a subcategory of distortion.

Don't you GET IT?

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I asked you tell me where I said that it was true, Strangelove. I merely said you were losing.

Pseudo rebuttals? Hah, if they were so fake, they'd be easily rebutted by someone as intelligent as yourself, right? You're making more statements that cannot hold water and you're making more excuses to escape your own damn loss. A pity.

How utterly predictable. How did I know Strangelove would walk away from another debate? You can't even man up. It's bad.

You've walked away. This has made many things clear.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
LOL.

Nice irrelevant semantics. That is, in effect, a distortion. One could say I have twisted the word. It doesn't matter if I punched a key or not. You make no logical sense whatsoever. Fine then.

You used a mouse to distort my name. That means it's not a distortion.

^ That's how ridiculous you sound. You think because you state I'm wrong it makes it so?

Reality check, friend. Come back when you know your head from a hole in the ground.

1. Ztrangelove.

^ A distortion. Plain and simple. A majority of the username remains and the character has been effectively altered, which is a subcategory of distortion.

Don't you GET IT?

Have a good day.

No, you said I lost. There's a difference

Good point, Strangelove! So where does it say I said it was the truth? I'm waiting.

I did rebut them. You just didn't give up. And that's fine with you, isn't it? As long as you outlast your opponent you can claim victory, right?

No, you just failed to address my points. Don't try to use that against me. Strawman tactics, my friend. You ignored several of my claims and just walked away from the debate. That's a loss, Strangelove. If you decide to get into a fight and you walk away, you lose the fight.

So, if you walk away without refuting any of my points, this makes you not the loser how? Explain.

Heh.

Because you exhausted me? Yes. You exhausted me with your long-winded lies and moronic logic. And I'm done because I'm tired of you. Not because I've lost. But because I (and others) have won, and you just won't give the **** up

You've won? This is a f*cking joke, man. Your pride dominates you. It's damn well sickening. I can't even stand you now.

If my logic was so moronic and I was telling so many lies, how come you could not refute any of it and resorted to Strawman fallacies and irrelevant misdirection? Seriously. The thread isn't getting merged. Distortion and Change are different. You need to realize this. Yes, they contain similarities but they're just different. WoW and SWG are both MMORPGs but they're different games.

I've managed to shoot down every single little shitty point you've tried to make. Hell, I've walked you through it step by step. Storm even had an example.

That debates can be won with incorrect logic as long as you can outlast your opponents and befuddle them with logical inaccuracies? Absolutely

Pointless semantics again. I'm looking at the only one who displayed a breech of logic; YOU.

Originally posted by ThePittman
You know I'm tired of this, I do love to debate over things hell even stupid things but this is getting tiresome and your stupidity is becoming boring to say the least. I know that you will consider this my "defeat" by your hands but if you consider that I don't want to get any dumber with talking about this then yes you have "defeated" me.

Have a good day.

Irrelevant semantics.

Jesus, this is so bloody boring.