Distort the username above you

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You have no evidence supporting that I directly insulted your intelligence. Based on a possible assumption you may be trying to destroy my thread, I'm going to ignore you for now.

Originally posted by Strangelove
No, you are making a fatal mistake. Any thread can be attacked for being stupid, spam, or just a waste of time. That in and of itself is not unoriginal. A thread can be attack and still original. I'm not speaking of any thread just being attacked in general. I'm talking about threads having their originality questioned. And this is usually black and white. If you have to spend time and energy defending your threads originality, then it's not original.

No, it can't be. Not by your logic. You said that if TIME + ENERGY is exerted into the defense of a thread, it cannot be original. This goes for any thread, deemed original or not, IF WE PLAY BY YOUR LOGIC.

You slip up each time with this:

If you have to spend time and energy defending your threads originality, then it's not original.

If a random person walks into a thread and insults it or questions it, it's unoriginal. ANY THREAD. That is what your logic plays on. If you have to defend it, it is automatically deemed unoriginal. That's faulty logic, Strangelove. Sorry, but it is.

The bottom line is distortion and change are different, making this thread differential. It's not a duplicate so just ... Get over it!

I'll brb later. I have a lunch meeting.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
No, it can't be. Not by your logic. You said that if TIME + ENERGY is exerted into the defense of a thread, it cannot be original. This goes for any thread, deemed original or not, IF WE PLAY BY YOUR LOGIC.

You slip up each time with this:

If a random person walks into a thread and insults it or questions it, it's unoriginal. ANY THREAD. That is what your logic plays on. If you have to defend it, it is automatically deemed unoriginal. That's faulty logic, Strangelove. Sorry, but it is.

The bottom line is distortion and change are different, making this thread differential. It's not a duplicate so just ... Get over it!

I'll brb later. I have a lunch meeting.

Originally posted by -X-Dr.Gonzo-X-
What is your purpose here?

I don't mind Strangelove coming in here and sharing his opinion, but if he's going to say something that is wrong, like Distort = Change and the faulty logic, I'm going to dispute it. Simple.

Anyways, I've got to leave. I'll see you guys later.

No hard feelings, Strangelove. I still wuv you. 😛

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
No, it can't be. Not by your logic. You said that if TIME + ENERGY is exerted into the defense of a thread, it cannot be original. This goes for any thread, deemed original or not, IF WE PLAY BY YOUR LOGIC.

You slip up each time with this:

If a random person walks into a thread and insults it or questions it, it's unoriginal. ANY THREAD. That is what your logic plays on. If you have to defend it, it is automatically deemed unoriginal. That's faulty logic, Strangelove. Sorry, but it is.

The bottom line is distortion and change are different, making this thread differential. It's not a duplicate so just ... Get over it!

I'll brb later. I have a lunch meeting.

Originally posted by Strangelove
You're saying the same thing over and over again as if it's supposed to make sense. It doesn't. You're wrong. This is a duplicate thread. And thanks to your constant need for an argument, it will likely be closed instead of merged. Congrats.

Nice retort. Don't worry, I still wuv you, Strangelove. 😄

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Nice retort. Don't worry, I still wuv you, Strangelove. 😄

Originally posted by Barker
How you you manage to get yourself into an argument in every thread you go into? srug

In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk.

Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending me, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending me, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done.

Originally posted by Strangelove
No. I was reporting a duplicate thread and Seraphim just had to make an argument out of it.Thank you for being somewhat civil

No problem, but shit! I've gotta go!

See you all later.

Originally posted by Strangelove
No. I was reporting a duplicate thread and Seraphim just had to make an argument out of it.

srug

You could have just dropped it and lets the Mods sort it out rather than arguing with Seraph.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
srug

You could have just dropped it and lets the Mods sort it out rather than arguing with Seraph.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Well you're right about that, but continuing to defend my point in an argument that I didn't start does not make me a jerk

I had to correct the Distort = Change thing.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Well you're right about that, but continuing to defend my point in an argument that I didn't start does not make me a jerk

Yeah . . . (I liked this thread I hope the mods merge it or someone bumps the otherone)

I quite dislike this fellow.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I had to correct the Distort = Change thing.

And you made your point admirably, but the threads are still the same

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Yeah . . . (I liked this thread I hope the mods merge it or someone bumps the otherone)

Originally posted by Strangelove
not to be mean, but don't you have to be somewhere? 😛

And you made your point admirably, but the threads are still the same

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk.