Alliance
Enforcer of the Republic
Originally posted by Oncewhite
if i reverse your statement, are you insinuating that a civil rights attorney won't be a republican? a professor won't be a republican? a person who is both a civil-rights lawyer/professor is not going to be a republican?not that i am one, but what do you have against republicans and what do you feel they stand for?
so, are you thinking that there is no such thing as Gay Republicans, or gay repubs that are for gay marriage...simply b/c the majority in the party is against it??? that's what you are stating about the civil rights issue in the republican party, since majority of dems were for it that must mean that no repubs were for civil rights....
I don't have anything against Republicans, I have issues with the Republican party platform, which any given Republican may or may not adhere to on any given issue.
I generally don't like conservatism, and I don't think its a good way to approach problems, but there are times when it works. We have a pluralistic society, and I think we are better for it.
People rarely fit into a "A" or "B" mold, but in a two party system, if you want you're vote to count, you gotta choose. You will find that I, despite identifying myself as a "liberal" am very "conservative" on many issues, yet, I will support Democratic candidates 90% of the time and I would not vote for a Republican candidate that I knew nothing about. I campaign for democrats, but am also at odds with them on issues. I choose a mold, despite the fact that the shoe is uncomfortable at times.
People are different from their parties, but parties are monolithic organizations in the US. People generally have associated values. If you have a fairly conservative view on sex, for instance, that can determine your position on a lot of social issues, which collectively will influence the party you are most likely to vote for. I'm not saying that there aren't Republican civil-rights lawyers, professors, or gays. I'm saying that its unlikely that these parties would nominate these people to represent their party.
I know of a gay republican congressman, but I know of many more gay Democrats. I know of former black Republican congressmen, but I know of many many more black democrats. You can't sit there and tell me when 95% of black congressmen and women in the US represent the democratic party, that there is not some type of force that skews the representation. I'm not saying its institutional (as in Republicans don't like black people) but there is some associating of values that skews the results. Hence, a civil rights lawyer or professor is more likely to be a democrat than not. I don't know how many civil rights lawyers represent the Republican party, but I bet it would be an odd disguise for a Republican.
However, may I point out that YOU first said that Obama was a closet Republican because he was articulate (despite the fact it goes against the majority of his platform). Before you go and question my "insinuations", question your own preconceptions first.