beat wonder woman

Started by spidey-dude3 pages

beat wonder woman

other than pheonix what other female can take out WW. NO PREP !

Superman . . .

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Superman . . .
read said female

Originally posted by spidey-dude
read said female

I know

scarlet witch

Originally posted by xmeat
scarlet witch

In HoM?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I know
well uh i dont think superman is a female.

Isis.

Originally posted by spidey-dude
well uh i dont think superman is a female.

He'd still find a way to win (and I'm still trying to think of a good answer)

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
He'd still find a way to win (and I'm still trying to think of a good answer)
keep trying.

Infinity?

she looks female....

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Superman . . .

b*stard... 😛

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
He'd still find a way to win (and I'm still trying to think of a good answer)
just say it he'll blitz her the same bs you guys ever say.

Famine (potentialy a one touch kill)

Originally posted by xmeat
just say it he'll blitz her the same bs you guys ever say.

I was thinking of him suddenly discovering a Kryptonian SexChange power

I'm not so sure about these "Beat {insert character}" threads...seems like the 3v3 rule is getting punched to hell.

As long as they don't become too predominant though.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
I'm not so sure about these "Beat {insert character}" threads...seems like the 3v3 rule is getting punched to hell.

As long as they don't become too predominant though.

whats the 3v3 rule ?

Sersi

possibly gamora

Originally posted by spidey-dude
whats the 3v3 rule ?

One of our forum's rules, which states that battles should stay at 3 on 3 or smaller.

It's ignored all the time, but as long as the battle seesm well thought-out or a serious attempt at a fair matchup, I leave them be.

It's usually only when I get ridiculous 25-v-25 threads or "Marvel Universe vs. Dc Universe" (a popular one) that I invoke the rule and close the thread.

So basically, this may be a bit too vague to be under the protection of that rule....but I realize it's an earnest attempt at gaining info, so as long as we don't have too many of these, I'm fine with it.