Originally posted by Captain REX
They didn't. Get over it.
They did as I proved. . .
Originally posted by Captain REX
Not hard to phone up a news station here in the States. Ush mentioned NBC, I repeat.
Show me this NBC, report, hell show me something that suggest such a report even exsist. Because, right now you have nothing but "what ush said".
EDIT: Again, show me proof of the exsistencet of a magical report/rumour that the BBC allegedly misquoted.
Originally posted by Captain REX
You only proved that you think that the British can tell the future. 😐Go ask Ush, then. The news isn't 100%, as you apparently expect it to be.
And, your ignoring the fact that several people predicted the fall of wtc 7, but whatever man.
Originally posted by Captain REX
Obvious to a conspiracy theorist only. That's an opinionated point of view, not a fact.
Originally posted by Emperor AshtarAfter 9/11 president George W. Bush and Secretary of State Condolezza Rice claimed according to the Washington Post that they had no idea somethng like this could happen. Yet, prior to 911 president bush was given several warnings by the FAA,CIA, and several foreign intelligent agencies.
Here are all the articles pertaining to Bush being warned:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/05/Bush_knew.html
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/05/15/bush.sept.11/index.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,718312,00.html
Yet claimed this:
[B]"I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile."
-- Condoleeza Rice May 16 2002 Press ConferenceSo, even if you think willie browns warning was a coincedental, it doesn't change the fact that bush had prior knowledge of 911 and claimed he had no idea that this would happen. Combined with the fact that several hours before 911 people were told not to fly (Coincedental or not) is very incriminating evidence.
So, based on the evidence we can come to conclusions.
Conclusion 1: Bush let 9/11, despite having prior knowledge
Conclusion 2: Bush and other government / Big business individuals planned 911.You can argue the specifics, but it doesn't change the fact that 911 is no longer a conspiracy theory. It's a conspiracy fact, the only thing left to question is why it was done. Because the argument that 911 was a mistake is , and no one knew is bullshit.
EDIT: NORAD apparently had an idea, since they ran drillss simulating attacks on the pentagon and twin towers 2 years before 911. So, there difinetly was not a failure in intelligence. [/B]
And here are news articles about individuals being warned about 911:
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
pentagon officials cancel flights[B]“NEWSWEEK has learned that while U.S. intelligence received no specific warning, the state of alert had been high during the past two weeks, and a particularly urgent warning may have been received the night before the attacks, causing some top Pentagon brass to cancel a trip. Why that same information was not available to the 266 people who died aboard the four hijacked commercial aircraft may become a hot topic on the Hill.â€
Brian McWilliams, Newsbytes News Network (a division of The Washington Post Company), September 27, 2001:
“Officials at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today that two employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York landmarks.†[/B]