Alright. Namor is the strength cap. Quicksilver/Northstar is the speed cap. TP Cap is Grodd level. Cap for versatility is regular pre-extremis Iron Man.
4 people.
Brick
ESPer
Tech guy
Versatility (pretty much anyone who doesn't fit into the above 3. )
Any character who doesn't violate the rules can be used. If there are questionable picks, Devil Lance, Blair and myself will review them.
ummm....If this is going to actually happen, I wanna participate. Which means I dont want people to think I can one up them in who comes and who doesnt 😬
Also a question: are you doing this in the same method as Batdude did? As in you have to pick a brick type character, a ESPer, a Tech Guy, and a Versatility guy?
Not just four Namor/Ironman/Storm level characters?
Originally posted by Blair Wind
ummm....If this is going to actually happen, I wanna participate. Which means I dont want people to think I can one up them in who comes and who doesnt 😬Also a question: are you doing this in the same method as Batdude did? As in you have to pick a brick type character, a ESPer, a Tech Guy, and a Versatility guy?
Not just four Namor/Ironman/Storm level characters?
I think letting people pick any 4 characters within the requirements would potentially make for more interesting battles actually.
Originally posted by Blair Wind
ummm....If this is going to actually happen, I wanna participate. Which means I dont want people to think I can one up them in who comes and who doesnt 😬Also a question: are you doing this in the same method as Batdude did? As in you have to pick a brick type character, a ESPer, a Tech Guy, and a Versatility guy?
Not just four Namor/Ironman/Storm level characters?
yep thats how it is
Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
Slow down everybody.I think representatives from teams is just going to end up with arguing/fighting, etc.
I think teams, amongst themselves, should choose a team of four characters, and then anybody from the team can provide scans or arguments for the duration of the matches.
👆
Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
Slow down everybody.I think representatives from teams is just going to end up with arguing/fighting, etc.
I think teams, amongst themselves, should choose a team of four characters, and then anybody from the team can provide scans or arguments for the duration of the matches.
Some teams have more people in them than others. It would be unfair 😬
Four representatives is more fair as it evens the playing field 😬
I would suggest a way for all four representatives to be able to talk about the other characters they are not talking about. How can you build a strategy without at least mentioning the other members on your team
Originally posted by Blair WindI was under the impression that all/most of the active teams had an adequate number of members... but, if you're worried about a swarm, we can limit it to a certain number of people per side. I suppose teams will have to set up individual votes or something.
Some teams have more people in them than others. It would be unfair 😬Four representatives is more fair as it evens the playing field 😬
I would suggest a way for all four representatives to be able to talk about the other characters they are not talking about. How can you build a strategy without at least mentioning the other members on your team
How about a league system rather than a knockout?
4 members each pick one character and have short 1 on 1 battles against members from the other teams.
3 points for a win and 1 for a draw.
Matches can last a couple of days with a 4-5 post limit.
That way everyone has equal responsibility for gaining their team's points.
It means more (shorter) matches for everyone and lets everyone face everyone else (apart from their teammates).
🙂