Amazo vs Doomsday

Started by Galan00710 pages

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
I think Galan has a point that you cant use the laws of the real world to justify ones arguments in comics, but he's taken it to an absolute extreme..
What exactly have I taken to the "absolute extreme"? 😕

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
You cant expect everything comics to be absolutely stated by the Author.
When did I say it had to be?

I simply said that real-world concepts, more times than not, don't apply in comics.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
There's nothing explicitly wrong with applying real world logic to comics but for it to have any validity you need evidence from in the comic to back it up.

There are points in Hunter prey when Doomsdays evolutionary powers defy all logic. thuis mayed me assume some greater force was at work. Sorry it was just a theory. 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
That statement wouldn't lead me to that conclusion...

Your saying that if DD would have been fighting in that very same battle, Amazo wouldn't have been able to absorb his power.... But the moment someone said "hey DD you're now part of the JLA", Amazo could have absorbed his powers then?

Absloutely ridiculous. Even if that's true, it's sickening. 😘

😂 Thats the way I read the issue. So yes if somebody had been stupid enough to have drafed Doomsday or Darksied into the JLA it seems like AMAZO would have suddenly gained thier powers.

And yes it is sickening.

Originally posted by Galan007
That statement wouldn't lead me to that conclusion...

Your saying that if DD would have been fighting in that very same battle, Amazo wouldn't have been able to absorb his power.... But the moment someone said "hey DD you're now part of the JLA", Amazo could have absorbed his powers then?

Absloutely ridiculous. Even if that's true, it's sickening. 😘

Yes that is what he is saying, how else do you defeat a unbeatable character. And I think Morison is one of the greatest writers around, and he's created an absolutely plausible ending to good story. IMO its far better than the writing that suggests there are several levels of infinity, and that there are more than one omni verse, which definition are intrinsically wrong. 🙂

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
Yes that is what he is saying, how else do you defeat a unbeatable character. And I think Morison is one of the greatest writers around, and he's created an absolutely plausible ending to good story.
Morrison is a great writer, but the concept in that particular story = shit

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
IMO its far better than the writing that suggests there are several levels of infinity, and that there are more than one omni verse, which definition are intrinsically wrong. 🙂
I'll agree with that for sure.

Originally posted by Galan007
:

When did I say it had to be?

You wanted an on panel statement that showed AMAZO's inability to absorb non league members powers, and you weren't willing to accept the applicable logic that me, Januti and Symmetric where assuming. 🙂

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
You wanted an on panel statement that showed AMAZO's inability to absorb non league members powers, and you weren't willing to accept the applicable logic that me, Januti and Symmetric where assuming. 🙂
I did accept it, I simply replied with,

"it's impossible to say either way". 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007

I'll agree with that for sure.

Really, i've heard a lot of people on here say otherwise. 🙂

If the Justice League had changed their name to Avengers, would Amazo have similarly been defeated?

Originally posted by masterbruce
If the Justice League had changed their name to Avengers, would Amazo have similarly been defeated?
According to the premise of that story......... Yes. 🙄

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
Really, i've heard a lot of people on here say otherwise. 🙂
The concept of more than 1 infinity has been established in Marvel comics, but that doesn't make it not ridiculous.

Sorry Symmetric Chaos, i was very impressed with your statment and i quoted you,then had a thought that i started typing, i appologize for not addressing it...oops

Originally posted by Galan007
According to the premise of that story......... Yes. 🙄

whoever wrote that story and whoever okayed it for publication should both be fired.

They're insulting the intelligence of their readers.

Originally posted by masterbruce
whoever wrote that story and whoever okayed it for publication should both be fired.

They're insulting the intelligence of their readers.

I agree.

Originally posted by Galan007
The concept of more than 1 infinity has been established in Marvel comics, but that doesn't make it not ridiculous.

The omniverse by definition ecompases all reality, real, fictional and transcendual. 🙂

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
The omniverse by definition ecompases all reality, real, fictional and transcendual. 🙂
I know this...

Yet both Marvel and DC have claimed to have their own Omniverse..

As I said before, the fact that it's been established, doesn't make it any less ridiculous.

Originally posted by Galan007
I know this...

Yet both Marvel and DC have claimed to have their own Omniverse..

As I said before, the fact that it's been established, doesn't make it any less ridiculous.

I heard Wolverine once defeated Hulk by DECAPITATING his balls off. 🙂

Originally posted by Donkey Punch
I heard Wolverine once defeated Hulk by DECAPITATING his balls off. 🙂
That's unfortunate. 😕

Originally posted by Galan007
That's unfortunate. 😕

And Impossible by definition. But i suppose its still cannon 🙂

Originally posted by masterbruce
whoever wrote that story and whoever okayed it for publication should both be fired.

They're insulting the intelligence of their readers.

Mark Millar?