Thanos vs. Rune King Thor

Started by Batman-Prime26 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
It's sad when you stick out in no way nor have you ever competed through debating on here. You're on the sideline and will always be.

You never sticked out in debating, that's true, you just stick out with your blind fanboyism and trolling, thats actually sad too. Nice dodging my other statements, the truth hurt, didn't it. I pity you now even more, 🙁

Originally posted by TheGodKiller

PillarofOsiris said : "13 pages of one of the most clear cut vs fights ever. Unbelievable. Thanos has ZERO chance against RKT. Why this was never closed will forever remain a mystery. No one in their right mind thinks Thanos has any chance whatsoever. End of thread."
My response : "Does that mean that quanchi doesn't have a right mind ?"
Your response to the above post : "I am open to debate the issue here."
My response to that : "Then debate it with the person who implied that ."

I clearly told you to debate "this issue" with the person who implied that glorious fact(not in the right state of mind) about you , i.e. PillarofOsiris .
So debate it with him not me .

Btw , RKT winning this thread is NOT up for debate . What is up for debate is whether or not you are in the right state of mind , and as I said before , you should debate it with the person who originally implied that aka PillarofOsiris , not me .


This ,
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Which is why I stated that RKT winning this fight is NOT up for debate . What is up for debate is whether or not quan is in a right state of mind . And that is a debate you and he should engage in , since your statements are what originally implied that , along with quan claiming that he was willing to debate that issue(whether or not he is in a right state of mind) .

and this . They are both the Final Truth .

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
You never sticked out in debating, that's true, you just stick out with your blind fanboyism and trolling, thats actually sad too. Nice dodging my other statements, the truth hurt, didn't it. I pity you now even more, 🙁

That too is the Final Truth .

He did do those things on his own as RKT. You lie all the time quanchi.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Their mission was to judge whether or not Earth was fit for surviving at that time . That was the 4th Celestial host's primary function at that time . A decision that Gaea subtly influenced in the Earth's favor .
They judged in favor to destroy Asgard. They changed their mind after Gaea's intervention.
That's all moot anyway since you are trolling claiming that the Celestials wasn't trying to kill Thor.


The Asgardians were only forced to promise not to interfere in Celestial affairs for the next 1000 years . They(the earth gods) broke that vow , and paid for it .
And the Celestials' "merciless blasts" were only as vicious as Thor's own blasts . Just because an action is described as being "merciless" doesn't necessarily mean that it is also "fatal" . Especially considering the fact that it was clearly implied that the Celestials didn't view Thor as a threat to themselves in the least bit .
What the hell are you talking about? Where in the comic does it say the Celestials were only blasting as hard as Thor was blasting? Merciless means without mercy. That means they were blasting Thor with full prejudice. Do you even know English context? Doesn't matter if they viewed him as a threat they still tried to kill him. Otherwise why blast him in the first place. Again they already judged Asgard prior.

I know exactly what was going on between you and quanchi .
Its the same story as with everyone else .However , posting PIS feats is against forum rules . Don't do that again .

I can play that game.
Don't troll again and I mean it.

Using PIS feats as evidence to show a character winning or losing is against the rules. Posting PIS feats (with a smiley) in response to others posting PIS feats is not against the rules. Otherwise joking statements statements (especially about squirrel girl) would be disallowed. That is why we have smileys and english contextual understanding to let someone know we aren't serious.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have. Thor is relevant to the topic. I won't. You didn't read the series. You only read a scan here and there. I'd rather you believed he can't teleport despite it being a basic ability without tech. Your ignorance is almost without comparison.

Thanos killed them. The others couldn't. They came back but due to Thanos' power he broke their natural laws of the universe. Power indeed. 🙂

The others could kill them. They just came back to life. Thanos could kill them but they STAYED DEAD.

I've went through the Thanos imperative and don't recall ever seeing him teleport.
So thanks for conceding that Thanos can't teleport anymore.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
It is a different version of the character . Stick to the topic .

You have no understanding of forum rules and debating. A different version of a character is usable IF they are clearly weaker or stronger in every relevant way.

Even using different characters entirely are usable when trying to show portrayals and relevant comparisons.

How do we know WWH is stronger than Savage Hulk? How do we know Thanos strength is at least that of WWH when he has no lifting feats? We use portrayals and comparisons as well as feats.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
You never sticked out in debating, that's true, you just stick out with your blind fanboyism and trolling, thats actually sad too. Nice dodging my other statements, the truth hurt, didn't it. I pity you now even more, 🙁
Seriously, just stay out of my way. Stick to being a cheerleader and drooling over fictional versions of death.
Originally posted by TheMask
He did do those things on his own as RKT. You lie all the time quanchi.
What have I lied about ?

Originally posted by h1a8
The others could kill them. They just came back to life. Thanos could kill them but they STAYED DEAD.

I've went through the Thanos imperative and don't recall ever seeing him teleport.
So thanks for conceding that Thanos can't teleport anymore.

So he overpowered the rules of the universe. That's the impressive part. Overriding universal laws in a universe directly opposed to you.

You didn't read it because it's clear he can teleport.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
No , I feel a discussion with you regarding this topic is meaningless .
So you concede.

Originally posted by quanchi112

So he overpowered the rules of the universe. That's the impressive part. Overriding universal laws in a universe directly opposed to you.

You didn't read it because it's clear he can teleport.


What Thanos did (keep the dead permanently dead) doesn't automatically give him the ability to even harm someone. Thanos (through Death) was able to keep them dead. But first he had to override their durability to make them dead in the first place, otherwise they wouldn't have died in the first place.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you concede.

Yes , I concede that your soul belongs to me . UHHAAAAAHHHHAHHHHHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Who wants quanchi's soul? Its like keeping a jar of sh!t for fun.

Originally posted by h1a8
They judged in favor to destroy Asgard. They changed their mind after Gaea's intervention.
That's all moot anyway since you are trolling claiming that the Celestials wasn't trying to kill Thor.

No , Gaea influenced their judgement as pertains to Earth . Technically speaking , they had already destroyed Asgard by reducing the Destroyer to slag . Odin and the rest of the Asgardians' spirits were dismembered , hence Thor needing to acquire the power of the rest of the skyfathers(his experience with the Hindu pantheon created a major controversy with the Indian American community, to the point that his fight with Shiva had to be retconned as a fight with Indra) , to bring back the Asgardians .
It was shown very clearly in that arc that the Celestials were present only to pass judgement on Earth , and since they saw the Destroyer and Unimind as major hindrances to their goal , they decided to eliminate both .
Remember Odin , Zeus and Vishnu bowing to Arishem ? It wasn't just bowing for bowing's sake , they were also forced to make an oath to not interfere in Celestial affairs for the next millennium , and since these 3 represented all of earth's pantheons , therefore by extension , the rest of the pantheons were bound by this oath as well .
Next:
Originally posted by h1a8

What the hell are you talking about? Where in the comic does it say the Celestials were only blasting as hard as Thor was blasting? Merciless means without mercy. That means they were blasting Thor with full prejudice. Do you even know English context? Doesn't matter if they viewed him as a threat they still tried to kill him. Otherwise why blast him in the first place. Again they already judged Asgard prior.
I can play that game.
Don't troll again and I mean it.

Thor : "For every blow that thou strike me down with.....I shall return the blow doubled in power" .
Considering that their blows didn't faze him completely and he continued to get back up and strike them back(although his blows were definitely not double their power) , I wouldn't say they were much stronger that Thor's own strikes .
Also , being "merciless" doesn't necessarily imply that they were being "murderous" or "fatal". You tell me to understand the context of what's written in the on-panel narration , yet it appears that you yourself suffer from this handicap .
An example : an interrogator can be "merciless" without being fatal . Same can be said about a sadist .
The Celestials were "villains" in this arc . Considering the brutal manner in which they had just dispatched the Destroyer , and the way they were dealing out blows to Thor , causing him great physical distress(but not outright killing him) , anyone who has even 3rd grade knowledge of graphic literature aka comics , knows how to understand the context behind a particular narrative , and has a good grasp of deductive logic , could see that the Celestials weren't even trying to kill Thor in this case . Nothing he could do(which included hurling the Odinsword at Arishem and we saw what was the result of that) could cause them any serious damage(apart from causing minor irritation) , and the manner in which they were striking him down clearly showed that they were playing around with him , as a weird sicko in real life would play around with an ant or a spider . IE , they were being vindictive , but not outright brutal the same way they had been with the Destroyer .
And again , they never judged Asgard , because they had only come to judge Earth . Asgard broke its vow not to interfere in their affairs , and in retaliation they eliminated it .
Next:
Originally posted by h1a8

Using PIS feats as evidence to show a character winning or losing is against the rules. Posting PIS feats (with a smiley) in response to others posting PIS feats is not against the rules. Otherwise joking statements statements (especially about squirrel girl) would be disallowed. That is why we have smileys and english contextual understanding to let someone know we aren't serious.

However , you further justified those PIS feats , when they were pointed out to by another poster , and then accused said poster of trolling on a baseless ground , instead of simply admitting that you were joking , and letting everyone go on their own road .
Also , you can play whatever "game" you like or want to play . Its not going to faze me in the slightest bit .
Plus , don't accuse me of trolling on a baseless ground , ever again .

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
No , Gaea influenced their judgement as pertains to Earth . Technically speaking , they had already destroyed Asgard by reducing the Destroyer to slag . Odin and the rest of the Asgardians' spirits were dismembered , hence Thor needing to acquire the power of the rest of the skyfathers(his experience with the Hindu pantheon created a major controversy with the Indian American community, to the point that his fight with Shiva had to be retconned as a fight with Indra) , to bring back the Asgardians .
It was shown very clearly in that arc that the Celestials were present only to pass judgement on Earth , and since they saw the Destroyer and Unimind as major hindrances to their goal , they decided to eliminate both .
Remember Odin , Zeus and Vishnu bowing to Arishem ? It wasn't just bowing for bowing's sake , they were also forced to make an oath to not interfere in Celestial affairs for the next millennium , and since these 3 represented all of earth's pantheons , therefore by extension , the rest of the pantheons were bound by this oath as well .
Next:

Thor : "For every blow that thou strike me down with.....I shall return the blow doubled in power" .
Considering that their blows didn't faze him completely and he continued to get back up and strike them back(although his blows were definitely not double their power) , I wouldn't say they were much stronger than Thor's own strikes .
Also , being "merciless" doesn't necessarily imply that they were being "murderous" or "fatal". You tell me to understand the context of what's written in the on-panel narration , yet it appears that you yourself suffer from this handicap .
An example : an interrogator can be "merciless" without being fatal . Same can be said about a sadist .
The Celestials were "villains" in this arc . Considering the brutal manner in which they had just dispatched the Destroyer , and the way they were dealing out blows to Thor , causing him great physical distress(but not outright killing him) , anyone who has even 3rd grade knowledge of graphic literature aka comics , knows how to understand the context behind a particular narrative , and has a good grasp of deductive logic , could see that the Celestials weren't even trying to kill Thor in this case . Nothing he could do(which included hurling the Odinsword at Arishem and we saw what was the result of that) could cause them any serious damage(apart from causing minor irritation) , and the manner in which they were striking him down clearly showed that they were playing around with him , as a weird sicko in real life would play around with an ant or a spider . IE , they were being vindictive , but not outright brutal the same way they had been with the Destroyer .
And again , they never judged Asgard , because they had only come to judge Earth . Asgard broke its vow not to interfere in their affairs , and in retaliation they eliminated it .
Next:

However , you further justified those PIS feats , when they were pointed out to by another poster , and then accused said poster of trolling on a baseless ground , instead of simply admitting that you were joking , and letting everyone go on their own road .
Also , you can play whatever "game" you like or want to play . Its not going to faze me in the slightest bit .
Plus , don't accuse me of trolling on a baseless ground , ever again .

Edited .

How does Thanos actually win?

Originally posted by The Sorrow
How does Thanos actually win?

By offering his naked purple @$$ to Thor , and repulsing the latter to death ?

Originally posted by h1a8
You have no understanding of forum rules and debating. A different version of a character is usable IF they are clearly weaker or stronger in every relevant way.

Even using different characters entirely are usable when trying to show portrayals and relevant comparisons.

How do we know WWH is stronger than Savage Hulk? How do we know Thanos strength is at least that of WWH when he has no lifting feats? We use portrayals and comparisons as well as feats.

That was me having fun with quanchi , since he too has used that lame "off-topic" excuse to avoid answering critical , relevant to the topic questions I asked him on other threads .
So , before accusing me of being ignorant of forum rules , you should have at least followed through our conversation and you would have known that none of my "off-topic/on-topic" exchange with quan was a serious discussion . The same thing you criticized me of doing .

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
By offering his naked purple @$$ to Thor , and repulsing the latter to death ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Seriously, just stay out of my way. Stick to being a cheerleader and drooling over fictional versions of death. What have I lied about ?

Seriously, sorry for hurting your feelings, son. Stick to being wrong 😉. Says the RL Thanos, the Lone Wolf, the Warrior dur 😆

Originally posted by h1a8
What Thanos did (keep the dead permanently dead) doesn't automatically give him the ability to even harm someone. Thanos (through Death) was able to keep them dead. But first he had to override their durability to make them dead in the first place, otherwise they wouldn't have died in the first place.
His showings against Tyrant, Galactus, Maker show he has considerable power. Think before you post. To override universal laws shows your power level is off the charts.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Seriously, sorry for hurting your feelings, son. Stick to being wrong 😉. Says the RL Thanos, the Lone Wolf, the Warrior dur 😆
You just embarrass yourself. You're one of those nobodies who just doesn't stick out. You're forgettable and never debate mainly due to inability.