Originally posted by Mr MasterYou get multiverse from the front pages of the book... right?
That's the assumption I got from the On Panel events.(IMO) according to what I read and saw,
Genis destroyed Half the Multiverse,
and that's me giving Entropy the benefit of the doubt.
After all Genis claimed it was HE who crushed Eternity,
while Entropy just helped "Bound" Eternity:
[B]"right before I (Genis) crushed him ... like this"Regradless of whether Eternity accepted his fate or not is inconsequential,
they still destroyed the 616 Multiverse, the ultimate Multiverse in Marvel. [/B]
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
You get multiverse from the front pages of the book... right?But nowhere on-panel in the entire book?
On Panel verification:
"I (Genis) could have let you faced Oblivion with the rest of the Microverse"
The Microverse is within a Universe completely separated from the 616 Universe.
If Genis destroyed the Microverse when they destroyed Eternity,
then it was ALL of Eternity (the Multiverse), not just one of his Aspects (Single Universes).
Originally posted by Mr MasterSeems weird how he would just mention Microverse, and not multiverse, or universe...
On Panel [B]verification:
"I (Genis) could have let you faced Oblivion with the rest of the Microverse"The Microverse is within a Universe completely separated from the 616 Universe.
If Genis destroyed the Microverse when they destroyed Eternity,
then it was ALL of Eternity (the Multiverse), not just one of his Aspects (Single Universes). [/B]
But meh, don't feel like argueing for pages.
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
Seems weird how he would just mention Microverse,and not multiverse,
Backside Front Page:
"ENTROPY is the Son of,
Eternity, the Cosmic Being whose Essence Encompasses the ENTIRETY of the MULTIVERSE ...
Entropy has enlisted Captain Marvel in a Quest to Destroy His Father,
... Eternity and End All Creation"
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
or universe...
Epiphany:
"Can't you see he's blaiming himself for failing to kill you and save the Universe?"
Captain Marvel:
"think of all the times you saved the Universe"
"Truth is. the Universe was living on borrowed time"
"the truth is, the Universe did END with a whimper,
Eternity didn't want to keep going"
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
But meh, don't feel like argueing for pages.
There's nothing to argue.
Genis and Entorpy destroyed and recreated All of Eternity, the Multiverse.
This is the nail in the coffin:
Originally posted by Mr Master
On Panel verification:
"I (Genis) could have let you faced Oblivion with the rest of the Microverse"The Microverse is within a Universe completely separated from the 616 Universe.
If Genis destroyed the Microverse when they destroyed Eternity,
then it was ALL of Eternity (the Multiverse), not just one of his Aspects (Single Universes).
swank
Originally posted by Mr MasterKind of ambiguous, however as far as that panel is concerned, as the microverse seems to be just a different dimension offshoot of the actual universe.
On Panel [B]verification:
"I (Genis) could have let you faced Oblivion with the rest of the Microverse"The Microverse is within a Universe completely separated from the 616 Universe.
If Genis destroyed the Microverse when they destroyed Eternity,
then it was ALL of Eternity (the Multiverse), not just one of his Aspects (Single Universes). [/B]
Originally posted by Mr MasterAnd that is what I was talking about, when I first responded to your post.
Backside Front Page:"ENTROPY is the Son of,
[B]Eternity, the Cosmic Being whose Essence Encompasses the ENTIRETY of the MULTIVERSE
...Entropy has enlisted Captain Marvel in a Quest to Destroy His Father,
... Eternity and End All Creation"
How can you possibly use this piece of evidence to support your whole debate?
Yes, yes, you showed another scan, but now a page talking about something (not even really relevent to the story either), goes against the long history of Eternity?
I don't get it...
I'm not going to answer the next part, because...
What's the point?
I know you're not going to concede, and I'm not following the evidence put up, so, f*ck it.
If every sentence has to be turned into a 30 page debate, then I'm not even going to start.
Originally posted by JuntaiBtw, I'm not arguing the interpretation, just making a note.
Kind of ambiguous, however as far as that panel is concerned, as the microverse seems to be just a different dimension offshoot of the actual universe.
Similarly, Darkseid, his planet, and New Genesis, all exist in a whole different dimension, but when the "universe" is in danger, so is theirs.
Ambiguous depictions like this would open a whole new can of worms regarding multiversal conquerors and feats, in both companies, imo.
Originally posted by Juntai
Kind of ambiguous, however as far as that panel is concerned, as the microverse seems to be just a different dimension offshoot of the actual universe.
Again,
the Microverse is completely Outside the 616 Universe.
The Microverse was Created by the Makers.
The Makers formed an enitre Universe,
by collectiing pocket Dimensions acrosss the Multiverse.
The Makers Remade this Whole Universe in their image.
Originally posted by Juntai
Similarly, Darkseid, his planet, and New Genesis, all exist in a whole different dimension, but when the "universe" is in danger, so is theirs.
Ambiguous depictions like this would open a whole new can of worms regarding multiversal conquerors and feats, in both companies, imo.
This has nothing to do with the Microverse.
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
How can you possibly use this piece of evidence to support your whole debate?
It wasn't the support of my whole debate, but proceed.
The On Panel evidence speaks for itself.
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
Yes, yes, you showed another scan, but now a page talking about something (not even really relevent to the story either), goes against the long history of Eternity?
That page is from that issue, what do you mean it's not relevant?
"Eternity's history?"
What goes against it?
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
I don't get it...I'm not going to answer the next part, because...
What's the point?
I know you're not going to concede,
Why should I concede to your proofless opinion?
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
and I'm not following the evidence put up, so, f*ck it.
As you wish.
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
If every sentence has to be turned into a 30 page debate, then I'm not even going to start.
I only remember replying once to you right now with On Panel evidence.
You're the one that keeps responding. 🙄