Would Hitler have ended Religious Conflict?

Started by Boots7 pages
Originally posted by siriuswriter
Hitler would not have ended religious conflict. Unless you count killing everyone off who doesn't have the same religion as you "ending religious conflict."

It would have been a final solution.

Talk about bad jokes . . .

Would the Nazi government have attempted to erase all religions had it have won the second world war? Unlikely, even more unlikely would it be that they would succeed in doing so. What's the point of the thread again?

Originally posted by Eis
What's the point of the thread again?

To demonstrate that the Religion section has a new nutcase.

Originally posted by Eis
Would the Nazi government have attempted to erase all religions had it have won the second world war?

Very unlikely that he would have attempted to erase all religions as he believed in God, Hitlers doctrine was only specific against certain religions. What was the point of your post?

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

Future generations should remember that Adolph Hitler could not have come into power without the support of the Protestant and Catholic churches and the German Christian populace.

I wonder how had he won the war he would or wouldn't have integrated Islam into the Reich?

As long as there exists religion in the world, there will be skeptics, conflict is really not that far following that trail of thought. Unless of course you believe Hitler would be able to convert every human being. Which is absurd. So, no, religious conflic is not something Hitler could have ended.

Originally posted by Eis
As long as there exists religion in the world, there will be skeptics, conflict is really not that far following that trail of thought. Unless of course you believe Hitler would be able to convert every human being. Which is absurd. So, no, religious conflic is not something Hitler could have ended.

Who knows?

The great masses of people do not consist of philosophers; precisely for the masses, faith is often the sole foundation of a moral attitude. The various substitutes have not proved so successful from the standpoint of results that they could be regarded as a useful replacement for previous religious creeds. But if religious doctrine and faith are really to embrace the broad masses, the unconditional authority of the content of this faith is the foundation of all efficacy.

-Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

Fortunately we won't know and even so, to think that in Hitler's lifetime the Nazi government could have achieved a Nazi-Poster family, homogeneous society is ludicrous. Again the answer to the fundamental question in this thread is no.

Originally posted by Eis
Fortunately we won't know and even so, to think that in Hitler's lifetime the Nazi government could have achieved a Nazi-Poster family, homogeneous society is ludicrous. Again the answer to the fundamental question in this thread is no.

How do you know if it is ludicrous, the wheat may need to be seperated from the chaff fo the bread to be good.

I find it amusing that this guy thinks that Hitler was right when he wrote stuff. To bad he was wrong about most of it. His commentaries have some points that are true, but he misses the mark on the significance of things.

He's kind of like Lenin. If you take the points one at a time...they seem fine...when you look at the whole, they all contradict eachother.

...its also really funny that I'm listening to "as those caissons go rolling along" as I'm writing this....

...it makes me feel strange...

Originally posted by Nellinator
I find it amusing that this guy thinks that Hitler was right when he wrote stuff. To bad he was wrong about most of it. His commentaries have some points that are true, but he misses the mark on the significance of things.

Das kommt darauf an!

Originally posted by Alliance
He's kind of like Lenin. If you take the points one at a time...they seem fine...when you look at the whole, they all contradict eachother.

...its also really funny that I'm listening to "as those caissons go rolling along" as I'm writing this....

...it makes me feel strange...

Das glaube ich nicht!

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
To demonstrate that the Religion section has a new nutcase.

Same nutcase [fool]; new sock... Sock.

Originally posted by Boots
Das kommt darauf an!

Das glaube ich nicht!


Wow! He speaks German too! Die sock.

Originally posted by Robtard
New sock... Sock.

Er redet immer Scheißdreck!

Originally posted by Eis
Wow! He speaks German too! Die sock.

Das geht dich einen feuchten Dreck an!

Originally posted by Boots
Er redet immer Scheißdreck!
Words should be moderated regardless of language used, don't be vulgar.

Originally posted by Regret
Words should be moderated regardless of language used, don't be vulgar.

😉

Originally posted by Eis
Wow! He speaks German too! Die sock.

Not necessarily... Just use one of the many online translation sites...

e.g.: http://www.freetranslation.com/

Originally posted by Robtard
Not necessarily... Just use one of the many online translation sights...

e.g.: http://www.freetranslation.com/

Du scheißt' mich an, fauler Sack!