Sin City versus 300

Which film do you guys like better/why?

Personally, I'd go for 300.

Discuss!

😮‍💨

Most likey "Both equally" even tho i have'nt seen 300 yet

Come on guys, I want some more opinions on this!

300

I'd say 300 too, but marv's part was great...if it was more like that throughout the movie maybe it would be closer...but 300 had nonstop, and i do not use that term loosely, nonstop action.

if im going for a story i have to go with sin city. Seeing as there is no story in 300.

If im going for action and emotional resposnes. I guess id go with 300.

i think there both made just aswell as each other. both are original and captivating, but i have to go with sin city. It seems to be more engaging and and complete.

300, because it felt more free to expand and deepen the story and characters, and wasn't as obsessed with adapting the graphic novel virtually word-for-word, panel-for-panel.

Originally posted by roughrider
, and wasn't as obsessed with adapting the graphic novel virtually word-for-word, panel-for-panel.

thats probably because there wasnt enough material to adapt a 90 minute film.

Originally posted by jgiant
I'd say 300 too, but marv's part was great...if it was more like that throughout the movie maybe it would be closer...but 300 had nonstop, and i do not use that term loosely, nonstop action.

non-stop action? What about those sections with the queen?

IMO,

300 was WAY better then Sin City.

Which movie told a better story? That would be Sin City, no contest. There was no story in three hundred - that isn't really too arguable.

Which movie was BETTER? Production values, emotional response, look, feel, experience?

300. No contest.

Originally posted by Galan007
IMO,

300 was WAY better then Sin City.

aside from the fact that the movie consisted only of one liners that tried to envoke emotion, and a shotty story that was better as a comic, yeah i may have to agree with you.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
and a shotty story that was better as a comic, yeah i may have to agree with you.

Because the movie followed the comic, nearly verbatim. 😕

Originally posted by Soljer
Which movie told a better story? That would be Sin City, no contest. There was no story in three hundred - that isn't really too arguable.

Which movie was BETTER? Production values, emotional response, look, feel, experience?

300. No contest.

👆 Yeah what he said.

Sin City had far more to it than 300 .... also, "epic" war movies have been done to death in recent years.

Originally posted by Galan007
That's your opinion, but have you even read the comic 300?

Because the movie followed the comic, nearly verbatim. 😕

yeah, i own it. I think some things just work better on paper.

300 was the better film in my opinion. Sin City is good the first few times but it gets old after you've seen it two or three times. Hartigan imo was the best part of sin city because he wasn't as two dimensional as marv, and I didn't care for Dwight's part in the story. But three hundred had great war scenes, great actors(sin city did as well) great speeches and to top it off it was closely based on true events as far as the war scenes went. I mean I can't think of a scene that I didn't like besides like two parts. 300 wins for me by alot

I liked both a lot but I liked 300 better

For me it's 300. No doubt it has a lot of cheesy one liners and characters but that's what I expected. I expected to see this movie that would pump me up through music, action, and of course even the one liners. Seriously, all those quotes from King Leonidas had to to pump you up. "Tonight we dine in hell!" or "Madness? This is Sparta!". How about that song fever dream? Just makes you want to fight lol.

Originally posted by Menetnashté
300 was the better film in my opinion. Sin City is good the first few times but it gets old after you've seen it two or three times.

And thats what people are like these days with some of the movies, see it 2 or 3 times boring wait for the next best thing to come along..... 🙄

the short attention span generation