Official WWE Thread

Started by Quincy307 pages

I can see Sting taking the belt and losing it to Taker to set up Lesnar/Taker 3

WWE has a history of having what they consider a "big hit feud" and throwing the title in the mix.

Sting WAS great at one point but honestly Rollins is better than Sting ever was.

I'd rather see Rollins v Ryback or something with a future outside 1ppv appearance.
----
On another topic, has anyone seen a Braum Stowman match? He seemed fine killing Ambrose & Samoan Beefer but can he actually wrestle? I'd be ok with Psycho Sid level in ring acumen. Btw I think he needs an easier name to remember like Brother Braum or something.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Sting WAS great at one point but honestly Rollins is better than Sting ever was.

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

If you are serious..

APOLOGIZE or BAN YOURSELF for a week!!!

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

If you are serious..

[B]APOLOGIZE or BAN YOURSELF for a week!!! [/B]

👆

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Sting WAS great at one point but honestly Rollins is better than Sting ever was.

I'd rather see Rollins v Ryback or something with a future outside 1ppv appearance.
----
On another topic, has anyone seen a Braum Stowman match? He seemed fine killing Ambrose & Samoan Beefer but can he actually wrestle? I'd be ok with Psycho Sid level in ring acumen. Btw I think he needs an easier name to remember like Brother Braum or something.

Pym you are usually smart with your words. But what you said was utterly blasphemous.

In what way is Sting better?

Rollins' doesn't get nostalgia or the luck of going against people who need qualifiers to explain that they are the best of a bad situation.

In ring: Rollins easily
Psychology: Rollins again, Sting was a Road warrior style wrestler
Promo: neither is great, but Rollins can get better. Please quote a Sting promo, not stolen from Flair.

Please tell me I'm wrong.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
In what way is Sting better?

Rollins' doesn't get nostalgia or the luck of going against people who need qualifiers to explain that they are the best of a bad situation.

In ring: Rollins easily
Psychology: Rollins again, Sting was a Road warrior style wrestler
Promo: neither is great, but Rollins can get better. Please quote a Sting promo, not stolen from Flair.

Please tell me I'm wrong.

DAMN LIES!!!

In Ring- Sting by a mile. Sting is the better athelete and has a body of work with diverse opponents. Rude, Muta, Vader, Flair, Luger all distinctly different and he has had classic matches with them all.

Psychology- Sting wins again. He went from being the invincible hero to putting Vader over as an unstoppable behemoth. He didn't say a word in the ring and with a few gestures became one the of the hottest wrestlers in history wih The Crow gimmick.

Promo- How can you have "Not stolen from Flair" as a caveat when Rollins steals from Flair all the time. He did so on the last Raw blatantly. 😂

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
[B]DAMN LIES!!!

In Ring- Sting by a mile. Sting is the better athelete and has a body of work with diverse opponents. Rude, Muta, Vader, Flair, Luger all distinctly different and he has had classic matches with them all.

Psychology- Sting wins again. He went from being the invincible hero to putting Vader over as an unstoppable behemoth. He didn't say a word in the ring and with a few gestures became one the of the hottest wrestlers in history wih The Crow gimmick.

Promo- How can you have "Not stolen from Flair" as a caveat when Rollins steals from Flair all the time. He did so on the last Raw blatantly. 😂 [/B]

Luger match and "classic" put together ruins your credibility.

Luger has had a total of 1 good match and that was with perfect at wrestlemania IX.

The crow gimmick was Halls idea, he told Sting what to do.

I said Rollins wasn't a good promo, Sting is so bad he stole the Woo from flair while they were in the same company. In Sting's 30+ year career, can u quote any famous promo?

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Luger match and "classic" put together ruins your credibility.

Luger has had a total of 1 good match and that was with perfect at wrestlemania IX.

The crow gimmick was Halls idea, he told Sting what to do.

I said Rollins wasn't a good promo, Sting is so bad he stole the Woo from flair while they were in the same company. In Sting's 30+ year career, can u quote any famous promo?

1) The promo before the 60 minute draw at the Clash of Champions on Worldwide.

2)The promo after he was betrayed by The Horsemen on Worldwide

Sting is howling not doing "Woo". You're reaching desperately here.

As to the Crow, Sting did NOTHING for a year and was so charismatic it made him the most popular wrestler in the world. If we grant everything you say it still doesn't diminish what he accomplished with it.

How many classic gimmick/angles solely originate with the wrestlers involved?

Are we really measuring Sting's impact against Rollins?

Originally posted by Quincy
Are we really measuring Sting's impact against Rollins?

It's the easiest way to run Pym out of this thread.

/Thread. Sting Wins.

Where is the 3rd gif from?

That is hilarious!

That kid sells better than Cena!

Originally posted by Quincy

/Thread. Sting Wins.

im not sure how being Botchamania fodder proves a man called Sting is better.
Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
1) The promo before the 60 minute draw at the Clash of Champions on Worldwide.

2)The promo after he was betrayed by The Horsemen on Worldwide

Sting is howling not doing "Woo". You're reaching desperately here.

As to the Crow, Sting did NOTHING for a year and was so charismatic it made him the most popular wrestler in the world. If we grant everything you say it still doesn't diminish what he accomplished with it.

How many classic gimmick/angles solely originate with the wrestlers involved?

first and foremost Sting is Wooing. Him and Flair had tons of woo-offs.

I asked you to quote, now three times and still nothing... Proving my point.

Sting got over because of the NWO, not in spite of it. It's like saying Austin was over because McMahon was such a great announcer.

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Where is the 3rd gif from?

That is hilarious!

That kid sells better than Cena!

its from an old WCW commertial. If I remember correctly the kid (kayfabe) won a chance to wrestle Sting and Sting destroyed the kid. I think it was a "don't try this at home" style psa.

Originally posted by Henry_Pym
If I remember correctly the kid (kayfabe) won a chance to wrestle Sting and Sting destroyed the kid. I think it was a "don't try this at home" style psa.

If they had used this with Orton when the RKO went viral it would've been gold.

I think both men have their strengths, and I don't like the idea of lowballing either of them.

I think their match will be good though, as Sting, even for his age, is still in pretty good shape, and isn't by any means a bad wrestler.

If the match ends with Sting winning and disappearing till Mania I'll be annoyed.

I think not putting the belt on Sting, unless they're building up a feud he'll win, is a waste of time.

He shouldn't be gone til mania though. Yeesh, no. At least Survivor Series, then Rumble if he's still champ by then.

Of course my brother is convinced that Taker is going to take the title from Sting, and Lesnar is going to win the rumble, setting up a final third match between both men.

I'd have rather seen Sting interfere in the Taker/Lesnar match and give taker the Piper booking a la X7. Taker chooses not to cheat and then loses cleanly.

Taker v Sting in double retirement match and both go into the HoF in Texas.

I feel the lack of story is really hurting the Cesaro v Owens feud. We get great matches but they don't mean anything. Idk I turned Raw off a few times and kept it off when Cena came out.

You know I have this feeling in my gut, Rollins will somehow hold on to both straps.