Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Bobby Lashley and the others, as said before, are not allowed to use the one facet of their ability that makes them good: Power. So don't look to him for it. I don't get why the WWE feels it's necessary to let these people use the mic. When Heyman was Brock Lesnar's mouthpiece, Lesnar was much more intimidating cos he seemed like a weapon. Like Taker did for many years under Bearer's rule. If Lashley had that he'd be better.
* good observation... wrestlers who can't deliver good speeches should spare using the mic, or at least refrain a little...
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Onto Cena again, it raises an interesting point, doesn't it?Everyone was dissing Cena back then for being "fake" and a "wigger", but if THIS is his real persona; Some boring, army fatigue wearing sleep-inducer, what makes for the better TV?
* maybe Vince has soft-spot for the kids who idolize Cena... 😆
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
As opposed to The Rock, who spoke in such a fake voice and rolled off catchphrases that he became much better when he was more natural.
* i did not get this point...
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
John Cena's gimmick came along a few years too late, people realise the "war" is false, so they're less inclined to follow his salute bs.He's just an ill-timed, ill-planned character.
-AC
* in my opinion, the WWE is making Cena the combination of Stone Cold's "SOB" attitude and The Rock's mic talent... which they failed miserably...
* and "earth-to-WWE storyliners"... why pit Cena against HBK or HHH when they want to push Cena as face? haven't they noticed how Cena was booed when he's against the caliber of HHH and HBK? see the comparison in the fans' reaction when he's against Umaga? why don't they write a storyline for the fans to appreciate Cena? poor, poor Cena... and i also wish he had some balls to reject a storyline that makes the fans boo him over and over again... peace out... 😉