Daycares at highschool making it abit too easy for teen mothers?

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Not true you do get an education and if you were in school before you homeschooled for highschool then you did get a chance to be around others.
You should go look up homeschooling on the web becaues you are wrong on what you say.I was homeschooling and it is jus like being in school you just learn at home.
No differences.Look it up and see.I have no idea why you think that way clearly you don't know any homeschooling familys.If you did you would not say that sort of stuff about them.jm

Really you are not the best role model for homeschooling. Besides it will simply not teach you everything that normal schooling will. You might know more from text books at the end of your education or far less depending on your parents. But you will simply not have the same experience and social skill as somebody that is taught on a school.

Besides homeschooling requires money, requires people capable and willing of teaching you and requires a hell of a lot of time. Something that a lot of family's can't bring up. For the young parents there are often only two real choices.

1.) Drop out of school and try to get a job so you can raise your kid.
2.) Stay in school and let somebody else raise your kid.

The second option is obviously the best but it requires people to take care of your kid. If the school is willing to do that, then that is perfect. Educating people is one of the if not the most important job of a government. They should do everything they can to make sure people finish their education.

And letting someone raise your kid is a good thing?It is there fault they had made and they should be able to take care of it themselves.Thanks for saying I am not a role model but I have to disargee with you with that.
Because I was homeschooled and it was not as musch as one would think.If you were not homeschooled then yuo have alot to learn about role models.jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
And letting someone raise your kid is a good thing?It is there fault they had made and they should be able to take care of it themselves.Thanks for saying I am not a role model but I have to disargee with you with that.
Because I was homeschooled and it was not as musch as one would think.If you were not homeschooled then yuo have alot to learn about role models.jm

Well, at least I can actually spell home schooled... a lot, you and much... Go public education.

And again, if you let the mother take care of the child herself. She will have to drop out of school, at least in 9 out of 10 cases. If she drops out of school she will be working some dead end job for the rest of her life, and suffering for a stupid mistake she made when she was young. The punishment far outweighs the supposed crime.

Not to mention both mother and the child will likely be a burden on the economy. There is a reason why education is so important, it brings in money later on. Educating people is very important if you want to create an economically strong country where people can actually have good lives. Forcing teenage mothers to go out of school will not help their education and it will end up hurting your education. Real smart move there.

In today’s world, education is more than ever an absolute necessity. It opens the door to a successful future and provides the means to realize one’ s dreams and ambitions. Only by staying in school will teenage mothers acquire the qualifications they need to enter the job market, where the demand is for skilled workers.

Many of these teenage mothers have been experiencing difficulties at school and their motivation to stay in school is already weak. Parenthood is a leading cause of high school drop out among teen girls. Adolescents who drop out of school take the first step toward social exclusion, isolation and dependence. Undereducation and social isolation lead young mothers almost certainly to job insecurity and unemployment. They will be forced to depend on social assistance in order to survive.

Making it easier for teenage mothers to continue their schooling will be profitable in the short, medium and long term. It is estimated that 95 % of single mothers under 25 years of age are poor. Moreover, if they do not return to school, they are extremely likely to remain poor. A lack of action would be far more costly to society and the economy.

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
The highschool I went to had a daycare

During the day, when you were in daycare, did any of the students come by and tease you?

I thought darksidejedi was home schooled? Bizarre....

If I remember the song-and-dance correctly, she was allowed to use computers while in her classes at high school. That was shocking, because if I were a teacher she would be doing a bit more of the remedial English instead of surfing the Internet.

My sentiments exactly. It's a sad day when the person debating for tougher regulations in education etc cannot spell schooled.

well, extra-extra emphasis on "home" and very little to no emphasis on "schooled" would be more accurate. maybe "home raised?"

I'm still wondering why she is debating it. THe side for it seems to be much stronger than hers at the moment. We come with more benefits than hers, which the only on I see is that our tax money doesn't go into the daycares.

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
And letting someone raise your kid is a good thing?It is there fault they had made and they should be able to take care of it themselves.Thanks for saying I am not a role model but I have to disargee with you with that.
Because I was homeschooled and it was not as musch as one would think.If you were not homeschooled then yuo have alot to learn about role models.jm

STFU!

What the hell is ur problem.
People don't always ask 2B pregnant and when school helps them I thought that was a good thing. What R u talkin' 'bout? I'd rather have my tax money go 2 somethin' like that instead of the war in iraq.

Originally posted by The Phantom
I'm still wondering why she is debating it. THe side for it seems to be much stronger than hers at the moment. We come with more benefits than hers, which the only on I see is that our tax money doesn't go into the daycares.

Well that and the fact the Govt will still pick up most the tab if not all for daycares for these teens, so really it is redundant and just a foolish additional cost.

funny how a fetus must be protected at all costs, but once its born, the attitude apparently shifts from "its just an innocent life" to the idea that it should be punished along with the mother just to prove some point. so i guess inside the womb a fetus has more rights and is respected more than a baby outside the womb. i guess one's basic rights rub off as they pass through the birth canal.

Originally posted by Schecter
funny how a fetus must be protected at all costs, but once its born, the attitude apparently shifts from "its just an innocent life" to the idea that it should be punished along with the mother just to prove some point. so i guess inside the womb a fetus has more rights and is respected more than a baby outside the womb. i guess one's basic rights rub off as they pass through the birth canal.

Originally posted by Funkadelic
A foetus can B killed when the mother feels like it.

im referring to the pro-life ideal, and not actual u.s. law.........yet

Originally posted by Schecter
funny how a fetus must be protected at all costs, but once its born, the attitude apparently shifts from "its just an innocent life" to the idea that it should be punished along with the mother just to prove some point. so i guess inside the womb a fetus has more rights and is respected more than a baby outside the womb. i guess one's basic rights rub off as they pass through the birth canal.

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
And letting someone raise your kid is a good thing?

Better than the child and mother living in poverty because the mother had to drop out of school. I don't think it will hurt the child that much to be in a daycare system for 6 hours out of the day while the mother goes to school to improve her life and the child's life.

times change, thus things change. the fact that there is daycare in highschools makes me feel that youths morals and responsibility is non-existant, but it doesnt mean they should be left out of the developmental process of high school. I would be more worried about the babies being victims to other valueless teens whom shoot the shit out of their schools. Thankfully though teenagers make for terrible marksmen. I mean what, the columbine clan had a small arsenal as well as numerous pipebombs, yet were only able to sucessfullly nuetralize about 16 or 17 kids. Thats pathetic

times change, thus things change. the fact that there is daycare in highschools makes me feel that youths morals and responsibility is non-existant, but it doesnt mean they should be left out of the developmental process of high school. I would be more worried about the babies being victims to other valueless teens whom shoot the shit out of their schools. Thankfully though teenagers make for terrible marksmen. I mean what, the columbine clan had a small arsenal as well as numerous pipebombs, yet were only able to sucessfullly nuetralize about 16 or 17 kids. Thats pathetic, maybe having daycares in the school will allow for these body counts to rise in school shootings, so for that reaosn, im all for it

sorry for the double post

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Do you relised that this does have them think that if they are giving them an easy way beside Abortion to support them?Someone else for my ignore list!Thanks.jm