Should Mod's have to explain bans

Started by Schecter6 pages
Originally posted by Starhawk
It's true, you can't ban everyone you don't like. And you can't go around accusing others without any proof. They did that in the 50's in the US during the Red Scare and allot of innocent people's lives were ruined.

profile this one. legendary horseshit.

btw, this site is private domain. you fail.

Originally posted by Schecter
profile this one. legendary horseshit.

btw, this site is private domain. you fail.

Was there a point hidden in that?

Starhawk... There are plenty more forums on the internet.... Why not go on one of those? You will not be persecuted on them and it's not like you've been on here long enough to make friends or whatever anyway.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Starhawk... There are plenty more forums on the internet.... Why not go on one of those? You will not be persecuted on them and it's not like you've been on here long enough to make friends or whatever anyway.

Because I choose to?

Originally posted by Starhawk
Eclipso was banned because he was trying to pester members.
Originally posted by a Mod
Starhawk was banned because he was trying to pester members.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Because I choose to?

Why though? There is no logic to it, you shouldn't yet feel any kind of attachment to the forums.... Unless of course you were here under another alias.

I'm not sure what more people want us to say when we ban someone.

Is "Sock" not enough?

Is "Harrassing other members" or "Trolling" not enough?

If you want more information you can look up their most recent posts and see the reason for yourself.

Keep in mind we aren't paid to do this, we do this for free during our spare time. From checking the recycle bin and all the worthless reports that usually find their way there, to dealing with people complaining through PM, to people spamming threads with porn or advertisements, to people who are angry making sock accounts over and over again, we don't have time to write a novel on why each person is banned or warned, it's just not reasonable.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Why though? There is no logic to it, you shouldn't yet feel any kind of attachment to the forums.... Unless of course you were here under another alias.

I don't need to justify to you why I choose to be on these forums.

Originally posted by BackFire

Keep in mind we aren't paid to do this

but there is something you're getting paid for, so start earning *unzips fly*

Originally posted by Starhawk
I don't need to justify to you why I choose to be on these forums.

No, you don't... But not doing so just confirms what I already believe to be true, that you are indeed a sock.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
No, you don't... But not doing so just confirms what I already believe to be true, that you are indeed a sock.

So your method is guilt by your suspicion? Thank god the legal system doesn't work that way.

and thank god this isnt a legal system doped

Originally posted by Starhawk
So your method is guilt by your suspicion? Thank god the legal system doesn't work that way.

No, that would require you to show up on my radar... You're simply far too insignificant to that. You will fade away, like many members before you. Either through a banning or because you will get fed up of forever being hailed as Eclipso.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
No, that would require you to show up on my radar... You're simply far too insignificant to that. You will fade away, like many members before you. Either through a banning or because you will get fed up of forever being hailed as Eclipso.

I don't mind you guys thinking that even though it's not true. Although one has to wonder about what kind of lives you have if that is all you sit around thinking about.

Originally posted by Starhawk
I don't mind you guys thinking that even though it's not true. Although one has to wonder about what kind of lives you have if that is all you sit around thinking about.

Well, I believe one obviously wonders about it enough to come up with the conclusion that we sit around thinking about it. I believe you have probably wondered enough about it to put yourself in the same category.

Originally posted by Schecter
but there is something you're getting paid for, so start earning *unzips fly*

Why have you never paid me?

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Well, I believe one obviously wonders about it enough to come up with the conclusion that we sit around thinking about it. I believe you have probably wondered enough about it to put yourself in the same category.

Now, I am very relaxed about it. You guys are focusing on a false premise though which is in the end, self-defeating to your overall goal.

Originally posted by BackFire
Why have you never paid me?

hey, all those pinapples cost money

Originally posted by Starhawk
Now, I am very relaxed about it. You guys are focusing on a false premise though which is in the end, self-defeating to your overall goal.
Originally posted by §P0oONY
No, that would require you to show up on my radar... You're simply far too insignificant to that. You will fade away, like many members before you. Either through a banning or because you will get fed up of forever being hailed as Eclipso.

Originally posted by BackFire
I'm not sure what more people want us to say when we ban someone.

Is "Sock" not enough?

Is "Harrassing other members" or "Trolling" not enough?

If you want more information you can look up their most recent posts and see the reason for yourself.

Keep in mind we aren't paid to do this, we do this for free during our spare time. From checking the recycle bin and all the worthless reports that usually find their way there, to dealing with people complaining through PM, to people spamming threads with porn or advertisements, to people who are angry making sock accounts over and over again, we don't have time to write a novel on why each person is banned or warned, it's just not reasonable.

Maybe then Moderators should be people who would like to do all of that without getting paid. If someone doesn't have time for those things and has too much going on in his/her prifate life then they shouldn't be moderators.