Fred Phelps To Protest At Virginia Tech Funeral....

Originally posted by Starhawk
I hope I did a better job of explaining that then Eclipso did.

perhaps the topic of your sock account would dwindle and fade if you would just stop repeating this unsolicited BS 😬 just a suggestion, take it or leave it

It's not BS, it really is in our Constitution. And the reason I repeated it was, I didn't think he did a good enough job doing it himself.

oh ffs 🙄 what if we all say we believe you (lie through our teeth), will you then shut up about it?

If you want I'm sure you can google and read the Canadian Bill of Rights for yourself.

i wasnt talking about the constitution....nevermind

Originally posted by Starhawk
I hope I did a better job of explaining that then Eclipso did.

Originally posted by botankus
Who the hell is Eclipso?

An idiot who post nothing but fact-less and pointless rants and is currently under the guise of StarHawk. He does it for the attention; best to ignore him.

It would be hard to differentiate him from a lot of users on here, but I'll try to.

Originally posted by Robtard
An idiot who post nothing but fact-less and pointless rants and is currently under the guise of StarHawk. He does it for the attention; best to ignore him.

Actually I am not, and my position is different then his. Do I think we should get rid of guns? Yes. Can it be practically done? No. For the reasons I posted above.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Actually I am not, and my position is different then his. Do I think we should get rid of guns? Yes. Can it be practically done? No. For the reasons I posted above.

For the sake of KMC, I'll play along if you agree to Schecters request and just shut up about Eclipso. Deal?

Okay, I am more then happy not to talk about him.

promise?

As long as no one else brings him up or calls me him. Sure I promise.

What's a whob?

kind of...but we're not supposed to talk about it.
elephant in the kitchen, you know?

Actually in this case. I don't blame the gun at all. This was an extremely troubled person and the school did nothing at all when there was many red flags that he was a disturbed and possibly dangerous person. If he wanted to hurt them he would have found a way to do it.

Originally posted by Starhawk
It can work differently though. Being a Law Student, I'm going to bring up a point that Eclipso brought up. In Canada, we have in the preamble to our constitutional Bill of Rights a section thats allows the Government to withhold our rights if they would infringe to a greater degree on the rights of another or cause a certain degree of harm to a person or society. What this means is that up here, you cannot promote or publish hate literature.

Now I know the counter argument is the "slippery slope" theory. In essence, that eventually we lose all our rights. But in reality, it hasn't been an issue for us at all. And in fact it's only done good for us.

I hope I did a better job of explaining that then Eclipso did.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Actually in this case. I don't blame the gun at all. This was an extremely troubled person and the school did nothing at all when there was many red flags that he was a disturbed and possibly dangerous person. If he wanted to hurt them he would have found a way to do it.

I think you're confusing the threads AND that's been covered repeatedly.

Oh joy. The "Canadian law student" is back.

Originally posted by chithappens
Still uncertain of how protesting at a funeral does anything.

What purpose does that serve? Am I the only one lost?

HELL NO!