Xmarksthespot... That 'smilie' was gold.
*Over 18 to read please.
All I see is a filthy leech trying to make a quick buck. Bullshit on his sons losing sleep and being traumatized, think about it, if they were that traumatized, why did they keep on reading? I doubt the sex scene started with *
Spoiler:, they obviously had to read until it got explicit and then keep on reading.
"fist in pussy"
Originally posted by xmarksthespotThat's nothing...I heard they have a secret army of He-Men just waiting to strike. They, of course, 'manufactored' these He-Men by using the energy they would use for "nuisance suits" as a supply for their Prince Adams to call for.
I heard they reversed HIV into a virus that boosts your immune system to the point where you have superstrength and telepathy.
What I mean is that Law Suits like this are treated as follows:
1. Mediation: The two parties get together and discuss the legitimacy of the case and seek a resolution.
2. Arbitration: Both parties must select a third party to give their opinion on the case.
3. Pretrial Judge: An informal court appearance where a Pretrial judge (Can be a justice of the peace or something at that level) Where a ruling is made. The 2 parties have the option of rejecting the ruling and proceeding to civil court. However if the Court Judge has the same ruling as the Pretrial judge, the party that rejected the Pretrial judges ruling is penalized.
4. Civil Court
Now keep in mind steps 1-3 are paid for by the 2 parties and not the tax payers.
The other thing they have done is apportion blame. How this works is, say we use the example of someone slipping on a patch of ice on your property and suing you. Well the court actually determines the % of fault of the plaintiff and the defendant and apportions the responsibility. How this works is, say you were the plaintiff and they ruled in your favor, but determined you were about 25% at fault. You would only get 75% of your settlement.
These steps have dramatically reduced court wait time, costs, and frivolous law suits. Now if Canada can only fix up it's pathetic criminal system as well.
Clearly, the point is that homosexuality is a sueable offense.
But I'm not into talking points.
The over riding factor is that this guy wants money for no reason on top of the fact that his kid learned what homosexuality is. But the real factor here is parental responsability. What was this guy doing when his kids were checking out lesbian liturature from the library? Was he perhaps doing the same thing he's been doing while his kid is jerking off to lesbian porn or learning about the erection from his friends at school?
so, what is parental responsability but a parent trying to prevent his or her kid from figuring out the world in the same manner than he did? And what kind of guilt is that? Pretty ****ing deep if you ask me. And that kind of shit only comes from parents. And what is all that but the parent trying to blame the world for his or her problems? "I learned about boners from my classmate and that's why I'm gay!" It's bullshit.
There are certain measures of humanity that we can't blame on someone else. It's just a fact.
On top of all that, why would you expect a book about lesbian love NOT to be in a library? Maybe for the same reasons 99% of the American public can't pronounce the word Library correctly. HELLO! THERE ARE "R"s IN THE WORD!
Originally posted by Starhawk
What I mean is that Law Suits like this are treated as follows:1. Mediation: The two parties get together and discuss the legitimacy of the case and seek a resolution.
2. Arbitration: Both parties must select a third party to give their opinion on the case.
3. Pretrial Judge: An informal court appearance where a Pretrial judge (Can be a justice of the peace or something at that level) Where a ruling is made. The 2 parties have the option of rejecting the ruling and proceeding to civil court. However if the Court Judge has the same ruling as the Pretrial judge, the party that rejected the Pretrial judges ruling is penalized.
4. Civil Court
Now keep in mind steps 1-3 are paid for by the 2 parties and not the tax payers.
The other thing they have done is apportion blame. How this works is, say we use the example of someone slipping on a patch of ice on your property and suing you. Well the court actually determines the % of fault of the plaintiff and the defendant and apportions the responsibility. How this works is, say you were the plaintiff and they ruled in your favor, but determined you were about 25% at fault. You would only get 75% of your settlement.
These steps have dramatically reduced court wait time, costs, and frivolous law suits. Now if Canada can only fix up it's pathetic criminal system as well.
You do realized that a ruling has yet to be made, the judge could very well throw it and and send the money grubbing plaintiff home on his ass right?