Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxford university)

Started by Devil King2 pages
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
. . . 😕 . . . you monster?!?!

Thank you.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxford university)

Originally posted by Devil King
Yeah, I know what the term havily means. I've just never heard it used in such a manner. What, did she have a refrigerator strapped to her back?

That's basically the reason the word is used: to suggest a fall in a heavy manner.

It's not controversial.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxford university)

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
That's basically the reason the word is used: to suggest a fall in a heavy manner.

It's not controversial.

I didn't say it was controversial. I said I'd never heard it used that way before. Is that British?

So, she did have something heavy strapped to her back?

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxford university)

Originally posted by Devil King
I didn't say it was controversial. I said I'd never heard it used that way before. Is that British?

So, she did have something heavy strapped to her back?

D-did I say it was British?

(and so on).

No, it's English. As in, the language.

She didn't have something heavy strapped to her back.

Here's what I inferred from the use of 'heavily': it was as if she did!

Fatass klutz broke fell down and broke something?

Anyhow, I'm having difficulty deciphering what, exactly, occurred. The original post is rife with grammatical errors that would shame a fifth-grader, so I'm not going to bother trying.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Fatass klutz broke fell down and broke something?

Anyhow, I'm having difficulty deciphering what, exactly, occurred. The original post is rife with grammatical errors that would shame a fifth-grader, so I'm not going to bother trying.

Quitter.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxford university)

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
D-did I say it was British?

(and so on).

No, it's English. As in, the language.

She didn't have something heavy strapped to her back.

Here's what I inferred from the use of 'heavily': it was as if she did!

Again, I get that. And when I asked if it was British, I was referring to the use of the word in that context. See, I don't live there, so I am less familiar with some of your terminology and what it means to a British member reading it. Since you are British and telling me it's English, as in the language, I asked the question. And the something heavy strapped to her back part was a joke.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxfor

Originally posted by Devil King
Again, I get that. And when I asked if it was British, I was referring to the use of the word in that context. See, I don't live there, so I am less familiar with some of your terminology and what it means to a British member reading it. Since you are British and telling me it's English, as in the language, I asked the question. And the something heavy strapped to her back part was a joke.

I don't think it's just British thing. I've seen writers from a variety use that choice of words. I've even met people around here who have used that phrase.

And I'm saying it's news to me.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxford university)

Originally posted by Devil King
And the something heavy strapped to her back part was a joke.

I got that. I replied in kind.

I just realised who you are, when the subtitle and quote rang a bell.

Seems like everyone is changing their name.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Crown procecuting.(Genius program Question from oxford universit

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Seems like everyone is changing their name.

Yes, I am tragically unoriginal.

But who uses slang or domestic jargon in laws?

Originally posted by chithappens
But who uses slang or domestic jargon in laws?

What?

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It's straightforward under normal tort law.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Could you say that in American?
That is American 😕

This falls under tort, or civil law not criminal law. This would be negligence . The victim would be entitled to compensatory damages.

Originally posted by Faceman
This falls under tort, or civil law not criminal law. This would be negligence . The victim would be entitled to compensatory damages.

STFU, name thief.

Originally posted by FeceMan
STFU, name thief.
Sue me. 🙄

Originally posted by Faceman
This falls under tort, or civil law not criminal law. This would be negligence . The victim would be entitled to compensatory damages.

I tried to explain that myself. Glad to see someone else gets it.