Wolverine versus Black Knight (Dane Whitman)

masterbruce Senior Member

versus

Board Walker Senior Member

black knight...so cool...

TheGame17 Senior Member

tell me a litte about the black knight.

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by TheGame17
tell me a litte about the black knight.

try wikipedia, I don't know too much about him. But he has an indestructible sword, some magical abilities, and is a great fighter.

capt it up Senior Member

wolverine unless it like god black knight.

must of the time black knights not that powerful,but somtimes he can get ubber

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by capt it up
wolverine unless it like god black knight.
must of the time black knights not that powerful,but somtimes he can get ubber

I dont know...I think BK can win, he's a great fighter and he has the reach advantage with the sword.

guy222 With my gal

Re: Wolverine versus Black Knight (Dane Whitman)

Originally posted by masterbruce
versus

howlett

capt it up Senior Member

Originally posted by masterbruce
I dont know...I think BK can win, he's a great fighter and he has the reach advantage with the sword.

thats not enough at all.

Logan better in every area as well as fastly superior fightign skill. You do know many of wolverines rogues wield swords in not something new to wolverine. Black night not nearly as skilled as most of wolverines rouges either.

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by capt it up
thats not enough at all.
Logan better in every area as well as fastly superior fightign skill. You do know many of wolverines rogues wield swords in not something new to wolverine. Black night not nearly as skilled as most of wolverines rouges either.

Black Knight has stalemated Logan and even Captain America before. He was even leader of Avengers for awhile. He's not some secondrate hero.

srankmissingnin VP of Comic Knowledge

They had a one-two panel encounter where they parried each others swing. That isn't a stalemate... that isn't even a fight.

capt it up Senior Member

Originally posted by masterbruce
Black Knight has stalemated Logan and even Captain America before. He was even leader of Avengers for awhile. He's not some secondrate hero.

no he fought logan for a few seconds and if I am not mistaken logan was wining.

so stalemating capt means you can take wolverine on?

No one said he was a second rate hero. He still not any were near logans level a of skill and some silly reach adavantage is not going to help black ngith vs a superior fighter.

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
They had a one-two panel encounter where they parried each others swing. That isn't a stalemate... that isn't even a fight.

that is a stalemate...unless they were just playing around, doesn't matter if the fight was short

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by capt it up

No one said he was a second rate hero. He still not any were near logans level a of skill and some silly reach adavantage is not going to help black ngith vs a superior fighter.

reach advantage is very important in a fight, it's not silly.

capt it up Senior Member

Originally posted by masterbruce
that is a stalemate...unless they were just playing around, doesn't matter if the fight was short

if you only swing twice thats not a real fight that just stupid...........

it does not help your arguement......if the fight had gone on black knight would have gone down.

capt it up Senior Member

Originally posted by masterbruce
reach advantage is very important in a fight, it's not silly.

yes it is silly. You think due toa reach advantage he can take logan own who faster, more agile, better reflexes better stamina, more durable better healing far superior fighter in a fight.

Logan verses swords all the time he actaully was traiend in how to overcome such advantages as reach.

Look at his rouge gallerly. Silver samuria, lady deathstrike, Ogun, shin and so on.

a reach advantage is just not gunna cut it and it one of your saddest arguements to date.

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by capt it up

it does not help your arguement......if the fight had gone on black knight would have gone down.

ummm we do not know that...that's just your opinion

capt it up Senior Member

Originally posted by masterbruce
ummm we do not know that...that's just your opinion

marvel said that it was black knights bad luck to have faced wolverine and then implied further that black knight would have gone down.

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by capt it up
yes it is silly. You think due toa reach advantage he can take logan own who faster, more agile, better reflexes better stamina, more durable better healing far superior fighter in a fight.
Logan verses swords all the time he actaully was traiend in how to overcome such advantages as reach.
Look at his rouge gallerly. Silver samuria, lady deathstrike, Ogun, shin and so on.
a reach advantage is just not gunna cut it and it one of your saddest arguements to date.

his sword is magical, its indestructible and can cut through anything and deflect energy

he also has a shield of night that absorbs energy and can fire it back from his sword

masterbruce Senior Member

Originally posted by capt it up
marvel said that it was black knights bad luck to have faced wolverine and then implied further that black knight would have gone down.

how did they imply he would have gone down? stop making things up lol

capt it up Senior Member

Originally posted by masterbruce
his sword is magical, its indestructible and can cut through anything and deflect energy
he also has a shield of night that absorbs energy and can fire it back from his sword

yes I know his abilities very well.

his sword can't cut through adamtium which makes he just a dumb version of silevr sameria just nto as skilled.

his swield can deflex energy true to abd wolevrine not firing energy.

so becuase balck ngiht has an unbreakable sword he wins? Are you fing kidding me...........

silevr sameria has unbreakable swords as did lady deathstrike.........

Who wins?