Thor vs Sentry

Started by D-Block21 pages

Originally posted by Validus
lol

Everyone thinks GS is the 2nd best team in the West now? haermm

It's up in the air they would have had a better record if Baron Davis and Jason Richardson wasn't hurt for most of the season. But they could beat Spurs or Phoenix and vice versa.

GS beat the Spurs or Phoenix...haermm

Originally posted by Skeets
GS beat the Spurs or Phoenix...haermm

They wouldn't beat either but GS/PHX would be fun, even if it were a 4 game sweep.

The Spurs are boring as shit. I hate watching them.

Originally posted by Validus
They wouldn't beat either but GS/PHX would be fun, even if it were a 4 game sweep.

The Spurs are boring as shit. I hate watching them.


Sweep...haermmjockey
Spurs ain't boring,they can run if they want,just ask Phoenix...ermmnone

Originally posted by Skeets
Sweep...haermmjockey
Spurs ain't boring,they can run if they want,just ask Phoenix...ermmnone

They can also cut up the rightful 3x MVP. haermm

It was his fault,not like it would of made a difference.Phoenix would of lost by 1 point less...haermm

Originally posted by Skeets
It was his fault,not like it would of made a difference.Phoenix would of lost by 1 point less...haermm

That's because that terrorist Tony Parker was flopping all over the court. It looked he got shot in the head when he and Nash bumped.

Parker shanked him,The Rock showed him how to do it without anyone seeing...
Gave Nash a buck-50..haermm

can get back to the thread, 😠. This is not a sport thread.

Sentry wins, barring a high end plot device showing, ala Godblast, and he might even be able to take one of those.

Sentry 6.5/10

Sentry is not taking 6.5 from Thor, lets be real here Thor power output is sick. Thor is stronger, more durable, and more powerful, lifetime of fighting experience Thor has the edge on Sentry, even Iron Man punk-ed Sentry hell even a damn dog bit his a$$. Thor will kick his a$$ with or without the Hammer, Thor own Gladiator who is just as strong as Thor and Immortal Hercules and flies at warp speed and Thor served his a$$ twice. Thor has all the advantage on his side, hell Thor can teleport Sentry too the negative zone where Sentry powers are useless.

Thor.

Originally posted by the Darkone
Sentry is not taking 6.5 from Thor, lets be real here Thor power output is sick. Thor is stronger, more durable, and more powerful, lifetime of fighting experience Thor has the edge on Sentry, even Iron Man punk-ed Sentry hell even a damn dog bit his a$$. Thor will kick his a$$ with or without the Hammer, Thor own Gladiator who is just as strong as Thor and Immortal Hercules and flies at warp speed and Thor served his a$$ twice. Thor has all the advantage on his side, hell Thor can teleport Sentry too the negative zone where Sentry powers are useless.

Then why make the thread if you've made up your mind about who wins?

And Sentry doesn't have a legit low showing yet.

Thor has plenty.

Sentry> Thor.

Sentry doesn't have .0000000005 of Thor's appearances though.

Thor >> Sentry

Doesn't matter if in his relatively few appearances, he hasn't been low yet.

Law of averages and all that.

Sentry is not greater than Thor, who the hell did he beat up please tell us and don't use that BS story that he stalemated Galactus, Thor has more raw power than Sentry, Thor's own godly energies destroyed his hammer, Thor will literally f**k Sentry. Hell Sentry got punked by Immortal Hercules and Changling.

Originally posted by UniOmni
Doesn't matter if in his relatively few appearances, he hasn't been low yet.

Law of averages and all that.

Right...give him 7-10 years when marvel won't give a shit about him anymore and you'll see plenty of low showings.

Sentry's high showings < Thor's high showings.

Sentry's low showings >>> Thor's low showings.

Sentry's average ~= Thor's average.

Originally posted by UniOmni
Doesn't matter if in his relatively few appearances, he hasn't been low yet.

Law of averages and all that.

Few feats means that the feats he does have lack validity.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Few feats means that the feats he does have lack validity.

That doesn't make any sense, or else one shot characters like Imperiex aren't as powerful as we believe.

Many believe on this forum Imperiex> Galactus, and while i don't subscribe to that mantra myself by any means, it has merit.

Going by your logic, Galactus > Imperiex solely because they're similar characters at similar levels of power, and Galactus has a longer history, though Imperiex had no low showings, aside from having his physical shell broken by an amped Superman tackle.

Law of averages takes all showings, and quantifies them.